Role: Former US Attorney, Southern District of New York (1983-1989); former Mayor of New York City (1994-2001); 2020 Trump campaign personal lawyer and lead post-election strategist; orchestrator of the public-facing election-fraud propaganda campaign and key bridge figure to state-legislator pressure operations and the fake-electors plan.

Status: As of May 2026, Giuliani is one of the most legally compromised principal figures in the post-2020 electoral subversion plot. He has been disbarred in New York (July 2024) and DC (October 2023). He filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy in December 2023 following the $148 million defamation judgment against him in Freeman v. Giuliani (the Georgia election workers case). He is indicted in Georgia (Fulton County, August 2023, RICO), Arizona (April 2024, fake-electors), and Nevada (December 2023, fake-electors). Federal: named (unindicted) Co-Conspirator 1 in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s August 2023 federal indictment of Trump (case dismissed November 2024). Multiple defamation judgments against him; assets being liquidated through bankruptcy. He continues to host a daily podcast / radio show and remains nominally active in MAGA media despite cognitive concerns publicly noted by multiple observers.

---

Background

Origins and Education

Rudolph William Louis Giuliani (born May 28, 1944, in Brooklyn, New York) attended Bishop Loughlin Memorial High School, Manhattan College (BA 1965, political science), and New York University School of Law (JD 1968, magna cum laude, member of NYU Law Review).

Federal Clerkship and Early Career (1968-1975)

• Law clerk to Judge Lloyd MacMahon, US District Court for the Southern District of New York (1968-1970)
• Assistant US Attorney, SDNY, under Whitney North Seymour Jr. (1970-1975)
• Particularly active on narcotics and corruption cases

DOJ Senior Service (1975-1977, 1981-1983)

• Associate Deputy Attorney General, US Department of Justice (1975-1977)
• US Associate Attorney General (1981-1983) — third-ranking official under Reagan
• Chief federal prosecutor for organized crime; established reputation as racketeering specialist

US Attorney, SDNY (1983-1989)

• US Attorney, Southern District of New York
• Conducted “Mafia Commission Trial” — landmark organized-crime prosecution
• Prosecuted Wall Street insider-trading cases (Boesky, Milken)
• Established reputation as the country’s most prominent federal prosecutor
• Used (and pioneered) RICO for white-collar and political corruption — notable irony given his subsequent indictment under Georgia’s RICO statute

NYC Mayor (1994-2001)

• Two-term Mayor of New York City (1994-2001)
• “Tough on crime” reputation; “broken windows” policing era
• Crime declined substantially during tenure (multiple causes; Giuliani took political credit)
• Police-community relations particularly strained (Diallo, Dorismond cases)
• 9/11 response gave him “America’s Mayor” status

Post-Mayor Period (2002-2018)

• Founded Giuliani Partners (consulting); various corporate engagements
• Failed 2008 presidential campaign
• Personal legal/financial issues mounting through 2010s
• Became Trump-aligned during 2016 campaign

Trump’s Personal Lawyer (2018-2021)

• Joined Trump’s personal legal team April 2018
• Replaced original legal team (Cobb, Sekulow, etc.)
• Central role in Ukraine pressure campaign (2018-2019) leading to first Trump impeachment
• Conducted independent intelligence-gathering trips to Ukraine
• Reportedly worked with Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman (subsequently indicted on campaign-finance charges)

2020 Election (November 2020 – January 2021)

Public-Facing Strategy

After the November 3, 2020 election, Giuliani became the Trump campaign’s principal post-election spokesperson. His role spanned:

• November 4, 2020 onwards: Public statements alleging election fraud
• November 7, 2020: Four Seasons Total Landscaping press conference (immediately following the AP/networks calling the election for Biden)
• November 19, 2020: RNC headquarters press conference with Sidney Powell (the “Kraken” press conference) — hair dye streaming down face; allegations of Dominion / Smartmatic / Venezuelan / Cuban conspiracy

State-Legislature Pressure Operations

Giuliani led campaigns in:

• Pennsylvania: Gettysburg hotel hearing (November 25, 2020) with state senators
• Arizona: Hyatt Regency hearing (November 30, 2020) with state legislators
• Michigan: November 2020 testimony to legislative committee
• Georgia: Multiple appearances; most consequential with state Senate subcommittee (December 3, 2020) where he played selectively-edited surveillance footage of State Farm Arena and made specific accusations against Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss (election workers)

Coordination Role

• Worked with Boris Epshteyn, Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis, Mike Roman as core legal team
• Coordinated with Eastman, Chesebro on legal-strategy memos
• Reportedly personally solicited “war room” planning at Willard Hotel (January 5-6, 2021)
• Made multiple direct contacts with Republican state legislators

Post-J6

• August 2022: J6 Select Committee testimony
• December 2023: $148 million defamation judgment in Freeman v. Giuliani
• December 2023: Chapter 11 bankruptcy
• 2023-2024: Bar disbarments
• 2023-present: Multiple criminal indictments

Trump 2.0 Period

In contrast to his 2018-2021 prominence, Giuliani has had little operational role in the Trump 2.0 administration:

• His legal vulnerabilities make formal administration roles impossible
• Personal financial collapse limits movement-funding capacity
• Cognitive concerns publicly noted by multiple observers
• He continues to broadcast daily and maintains a small commentariat presence
• Trump publicly distanced from him during the 2024 campaign

---

Democratic Malice Assessment

Cumulative Designation: Sustained Campaign of Democratic Destruction

Metric	Value
Qualifying actions scored	4
Highest individual DMS	5 — Systemic Malice
Primary categories	Voter Confidence Subversion, Election Process Sabotage

Scored Action 1: Led the public-facing “stolen election” propaganda campaign

Category: Voter Confidence Subversion
DMS: 5 — Systemic Malice

Action: Led the public-facing “stolen election” propaganda campaign — press conferences, state legislative hearings in AZ, PA, MI, GA, WI, NV; made specific election fraud claims that were contradicted by the department’s own evidence and by his private admissions

Key Evidence: J6 Committee final report and hearings; Giuliani’s own recorded statements in deposition (admitting no independent review of fraud claims); Freeman v. Giuliani discovery record; disbarment proceedings in NY and DC citing false statements; 60+ court rejections of claims he publicly promoted

Ideology vs. Malice Determination: Giuliani’s own deposition record shows he made public fraud allegations without conducting independent verification of the claims he was promoting — he was advancing the narrative, not litigating evidence. NY courts’ disbarment findings explicitly cited false statements of fact, not merely losing legal arguments. Sustained across seven states, over three months, in public fora = systemic scope. All five distinguishing factors apply.

---

Scored Action 2: Named Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss

Category: Voter Confidence Subversion
DMS: 4 — Active Direction

Action: Named Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss — private Atlanta election workers — as perpetrators of specific fraudulent acts at a Georgia State Senate subcommittee hearing, using surveillance video he misrepresented; accusations led to death threats and both women being driven from their homes

Key Evidence: Freeman v. Giuliani, DC federal court, $148M defamation judgment (December 2023); Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss sworn testimony to J6 Committee; documented harassment and threats against both women; Giuliani’s own admissions in bankruptcy proceedings regarding inability to pay judgment

Ideology vs. Malice Determination: A federal court found, after full trial, that Giuliani made false statements of fact (not opinion) about specific private individuals — with documented catastrophic consequences for those individuals. The public official status of the venue (state legislative subcommittee) and the specificity of the false accusations (naming individuals as having committed specific criminal acts with specified evidence that Giuliani misrepresented) distinguish this from protected political speech. Freeman is a judicial finding of defamatory malice in the legal sense.

---

Scored Action 3: Organized the multi-state fake elector pressure operation

Category: Election Process Sabotage
DMS: 5 — Systemic Malice

Action: Organized the multi-state fake elector pressure operation — coordinated state-legislator pressure campaigns in seven states designed to convince Republican legislators to certify alternate slates of electors

Key Evidence: Jack Smith federal indictment naming Giuliani as Co-Conspirator #1; Georgia RICO indictment (Aug. 2023); Arizona fake-electors indictment (Apr. 2024); Nevada fake-electors indictment (Dec. 2023); J6 Committee final report

Ideology vs. Malice Determination: Giuliani’s coordination role in the state-legislature pressure operations is established by three separate state indictments and his designation as the lead unindicted co-conspirator in the federal case. He provided the “evidence” (which the courts rejected) to state legislators to justify recertification. Sustained across seven states = systemic scope. Process subversion: bypassing the judicial process (60+ courts had rejected the fraud claims) to pressure state legislative action on a different track.

---

Scored Action 4: Willard Hotel “War Room” (January 5, 2021) and “trial by combat” Ellipse speech…

Category: Election Process Sabotage
DMS: 4 — Active Direction

Action: Willard Hotel “War Room” (January 5, 2021) and “trial by combat” Ellipse speech (January 6, 2021) — coordinated the final-day pressure operations including Pence strategy and protest logistics; called for “trial by combat” hours before the Capitol was breached

Key Evidence: Video record of Ellipse speech; J6 Committee documentation of Willard war room; Giuliani’s phone calls to Republican senators attempting to delay certification (including misdial of Mike Lee); J6 Committee final report

Ideology vs. Malice Determination: “Trial by combat” was not rhetorical flourish delivered in a neutral context. It was delivered by the president’s personal lawyer at a rally designed to put pressure on Congress hours before the certification, immediately before a crowd marched to the Capitol. The Willard coordination role establishes that Giuliani understood what was planned and participated in organizing it. Active Direction rather than Systemic because his personal operational role on January 6 was one node in a larger network rather than the originating design.

---

What Is NOT Scored

Giuliani’s legal career, his work as US Attorney and Mayor, his 9/11 response, his political conservatism, and his general support for Trump are ideology. DMA scoring applies to the specific election subversion campaign from November 2020 through January 6, 2021, and the specific defamatory conduct directed at private individuals in an official proceeding.

Assessment Basis

The Freeman v. Giuliani judgment ($148M, December 2023) is a judicial finding of fact following a full trial. The three state criminal indictments and his designation as federal Co-Conspirator #1 are procedural documents establishing the scope of his alleged conduct. The disbarment findings (NY and DC) are independent institutional findings of false statements of fact. Each provides a separate primary-source foundation for the DMA scores assigned.

Legal Disclaimer

The Democratic Malice Assessment is an analytical framework applying defined criteria to documented public conduct. Designations are evaluative conclusions, not statements of criminal guilt. No DMS score constitutes a finding of criminal liability. The Freeman v. Giuliani judgment is a finding of civil defamation liability, not criminal malice; the DMA use of “malice” refers to this framework’s defined criteria, not the legal standard in that case. The factual predicates are cited to primary sources; the evaluative conclusions are protected expression. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan and its progeny apply to this assessment of a public figure’s public conduct. The distinction between factual assertion and evaluative judgment is governed by Milkovich v. Lorain Journal (1990); every DMS score in this profile is the latter.

---

Role in Democratic Erosion / Jan 6

Public-Facing Narrative Architect

Giuliani was the principal public communicator of the post-2020 “stolen election” narrative. While Trump held rallies and Twitter, and Eastman/Chesebro produced legal theory, Giuliani:

• Made the public allegations
• Performed the press conferences
• Conducted the state-legislator hearings
• Provided continuous TV / radio / podcast presence
• Became the face of the “stolen election” claim

State-Legislature Pressure Operations

Giuliani coordinated parallel pressure operations in seven states:

• Designed to convince state legislators to certify alternate slates
• Provided seemingly-credible evidence to legislative committees
• Created political pressure on state Republican officials
• Generated fundraising contributions and base mobilization

Specific Defamatory Conduct

The Freeman v. Giuliani judgment ($148 million) addressed Giuliani’s specific December 3, 2020 accusations against Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss (Atlanta election workers). The accusations:

• Were made on a Georgia State Senate subcommittee with surveillance video
• Alleged the women were “passing USB drives like vials of cocaine”
• Identified by name, leading to harassment, threats, and the women being driven from their homes

Willard Hotel “War Room”

Giuliani was a central figure in the January 5, 2021 “war room” that included:

• Steve Bannon
• Boris Epshteyn
• Mike Flynn
• John Eastman
• Various other Trump operatives

The war room reportedly coordinated:

• January 6 protest logistics
• Pence pressure strategy
• State-by-state contingencies

Specific January 6 Conduct

• Spoke at the Ellipse rally morning of January 6
• Called for “trial by combat”
• Continued to speak with Trump throughout the day’s events
• Made phone calls to Republican senators after the Capitol breach (including misdialing Sen. Mike Lee) reportedly to ask for delay of certification

Continuing Public Position

Giuliani has continued to assert the 2020 election was stolen even after defamation judgment, bankruptcy, and disbarments. As of May 2026, he repeats the claims on his daily broadcasts.

---

Legal Status and Investigations

Criminal Cases

• Georgia (Fulton County): RICO indictment + multiple counts (August 2023, Case No. 23SC188947); pleaded not guilty; case status frozen post-Willis disqualification
• Arizona (Maricopa County): Nine felony counts in fake-electors prosecution (April 2024); pretrial as of May 2026
• Nevada (Clark County): Indicted December 2023 in fake-electors prosecution
• Federal: Named Co-Conspirator 1 in United States v. Trump (Case No. 1:23-cr-00257-TSC); case dismissed November 2024
• Various state ethics: Multiple

Civil Cases

• Freeman v. Giuliani (DC federal court, Case No. 1:21-cv-03354-BAH): $148 million defamation judgment (December 2023)
• Dominion v. Giuliani: Pending defamation suit
• Smartmatic v. Giuliani: Pending defamation suit
• Capitol Police officer suits: Multiple; Giuliani named
• Hunter Biden v. Giuliani / Costello: Computer/data-theft suit (filed 2023)

Bankruptcy

• Chapter 11 filing, December 2023
• Asset liquidation ongoing
• Manhattan apartment sold; Florida condo sold

Bar Discipline

• New York: Disbarred July 2024
• DC: Disbarred October 2023
• Florida: Various proceedings

J6 Committee

• Testified August 2022
• Central focus of multiple Committee hearings

Watch

• Trump pardon possibility (federal case dismissed, but lingering federal exposure)

---

Personal-Public Interest Conflicts

Financial Holdings (Pre-Bankruptcy)

• Giuliani Partners: Consulting firm; revenues declining substantially through 2010s-2020s
• Real estate: Manhattan apartment (sold via bankruptcy); Florida condo (sold); various other holdings
• Speaking and broadcasting: Substantial income source 2020-2023
• Trump-related fundraising: Various PACs and legal-defense vehicles
• Loans / debts: Substantial pre-2020; expanded by post-2020 legal expenses

Bankruptcy Status (2023-)

• Massive defamation judgment makes ongoing financial recovery effectively impossible
• Asset liquidation will continue for years
• Future earning potential constrained by disbarments

Ukraine/Foreign Exposure

• 2018-2019 Ukraine work: Worked with Lev Parnas, Igor Fruman in Ukraine pressure campaign
• Federal investigation of Giuliani: Closed without charges (2022)
• No FARA registrations
• Unregistered foreign-agent concerns: Multiple instances; never formally charged

Regulatory Recusals and Waivers

• N/A — was Trump’s personal lawyer, not government employee

Family Business Entanglements

• Andrew Giuliani: Son; former Trump 1.0 White House staffer; failed 2022 NY gubernatorial campaign
• Ex-spouses: Divorces complicated finances; Judith Nathan (third wife) divorce 2018-2020
• Multiple family members affected by financial collapse

Specific Decisions Intersecting Personal Interests

• Continuing the “stolen election” narrative despite legal exposure: Giuliani’s public statements have continued long after they served any defensible legal-strategy purpose; have been principal driver of his ongoing legal liability
• Defamation judgment magnification: Each repeated assertion of debunked allegations has increased damages exposure
• Bankruptcy timing: Filed December 2023, approximately 1 month after Freeman judgment, in apparent attempt to limit recovery on judgment
• Continued broadcasting: Maintaining radio/podcast presence is one of few remaining income sources but exposes him to additional defamation liability

---

Key Connections

Direct Trump Network

• Donald Trump — Personal lawyer, longtime ally
• Donald Trump Jr. — Close
• Eric Trump — Close
• Mark Meadows — Coordinated through 2020-2021
• Boris Epshteyn — Bridge to Trump campaign legal team
• Stephen Miller — Coordinated

2020 Legal Team

• Sidney Powell — November 19, 2020 press conference; subsequent split
• Jenna Ellis — Senior advisor; subsequent guilty plea
• Joseph diGenova — Senior advisor
• Victoria Toensing — Senior advisor
• John Eastman — Coordinated
• Kenneth Chesebro — Coordinated

Willard Hotel “War Room”

• Steve Bannon
• John Eastman
• Mike Flynn
• Boris Epshteyn
• Bernie Kerik

Pre-2020 Ukraine Network

• Lev Parnas — Subsequently cooperator
• Igor Fruman — Subsequently convicted
• Yuri Lutsenko (Ukrainian official)
• Viktor Shokin (former Ukrainian prosecutor general)
• Joseph diGenova / Toensing — Coordinated

State-Level Pressure Targets

• Multiple Republican state legislators in PA, AZ, MI, GA, WI, NM, NV
• Brian Kemp (GA) — Pressure target
• Brad Raffensperger (GA) — Pressure target
• Doug Ducey (AZ) — Pressure target
• Various PA, MI legislators — Direct contact

Movement / Media

• WABC Radio (broadcasts)
• America’s Mayor Live (podcast)
• Various right-wing media

Adversaries / Targets

• Ruby Freeman — Defamation plaintiff
• Shaye Moss — Defamation plaintiff
• Dominion Voting Systems — Defamation plaintiff
• Smartmatic — Defamation plaintiff
• Hunter Biden — Computer/data theft plaintiff
• Special Counsel Jack Smith (federal case dismissed)
• Fulton County DA Fani Willis
• DC Bar / NY Bar — Disbarment authorities

---

---

Investigative trail pointers (public records)

Education only — verify independently. Absence of hits is not proof.

Channel	Starting points
Federal courts	CourtListener / PACER party and attorney searches (spelling variants)
Campaign finance	FEC + OpenSecrets for committees and donors tied to documented roles
Corporate / LLC	State secretary of state; OpenCorporates for cross-border shells from reporting
Sanctions / PEP	OpenSanctions when international business context is already sourced
Contracts / grants	USAspending.gov for named entities from investigations

Use public-records-research-specialist, corporate-intelligence-investigator, and public-corruption-ombudsman evidence tiers.

---

Factual correction requests: If you believe information in this profile is incorrect, please contact factcheck@patriot.university with your name (optional), the specific claim, and any supporting documentation. We review all submissions and correct verified errors promptly.

For Trump Supporters: Questions Worth Considering

Rudy Giuliani pioneered RICO prosecution as US Attorney for the Southern District of New York — he used it to take down the Mafia Commission. He became “America’s Mayor” after September 11. He is now disbarred in New York and DC, indicted in Georgia and Arizona and Nevada for his role in the fake-electors scheme, filed for bankruptcy after a $148 million defamation judgment for falsely accusing Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss of fraud, and has been distanced from by Trump during the 2024 campaign. He has daily cognitive function concerns noted by multiple observers.

Here’s a question worth sitting with: Giuliani built his career prosecuting organized crime using RICO — the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations statute, which targets coordinated criminal conspiracies. He is now indicted under Georgia’s RICO statute — the same type of law he made famous — for his role in the coordinated post-2020 election subversion conspiracy. A man who spent his career prosecuting criminal conspiracies now faces criminal conspiracy charges. His 2020 activities — the state-legislator pressure operations, the fake-electors coordination, the specific false statements about election workers — are the conduct underlying those charges. Whatever you believe about the prosecutions, that trajectory is the result of choices he made. What happened between the 9/11 press conferences and the Four Seasons Total Landscaping press conference?

A second question about Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss: These were two Georgia election workers — mother and daughter — who processed ballots as part of their jobs. Giuliani played selectively edited surveillance footage of them at a Georgia Senate subcommittee hearing and accused them of “suitcases of illegal ballots” and fraud. The allegations were false. A federal jury awarded them $148 million in damages. Ruby Freeman said she no longer feels safe using her name in public. Shaye Moss gained 60 pounds and stopped leaving her house. They were ordinary public employees doing their jobs during a pandemic election. What is the right word for what Giuliani did to them — and what is the right standard for accountability?

If the answer is yes, then that standard applies here too. Consistent standards for powerful people aren’t partisan. They’re the foundation of any system where laws matter more than who you know.

A second question: The people documented in these profiles hold, or have held, significant power over systems that affect your life — government programs, elections, law enforcement, the economy. When powerful people act in ways that benefit themselves or their allies rather than the public they serve, the costs fall on everyone. That’s true regardless of party.

You don’t have to agree with every political perspective represented in this knowledge base. You just have to ask whether the documented facts meet your own standard for how public officials should conduct themselves. That’s a question every citizen has the right — and the responsibility — to ask.

Sources

• State v. Trump et al., Fulton County RICO indictment (August 2023)
• State v. Boris Epshteyn et al., Maricopa County indictment (April 2024)
• State v. Giuliani et al., Clark County (Nevada) indictment (December 2023)
• Federal indictment (August 1, 2023) naming Giuliani as Co-Conspirator 1
• January 6th Select Committee Final Report (December 2022)
• Freeman v. Giuliani, DC federal court ($148M defamation judgment, December 2023)
• Dominion v. Giuliani (pending defamation)
• Smartmatic v. Giuliani (pending defamation)
• Giuliani Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings (December 2023-)
• Senate Judiciary Committee, “Subverting Justice”
• Politico, “The Decline and Fall of Rudy Giuliani” (multiple 2022-2024)
• Atlantic, “How Rudy Lost Everything” (multiple)
• New York Times, multiple investigative pieces 2020-2024
• Andrew Kirtzman, Giuliani: The Rise and Tragic Fall of America’s Mayor (2022)
• NY Bar disbarment proceedings (2024)
• DC Bar disbarment proceedings (2023)
• Ruby Freeman / Shaye Moss J6 Select Committee testimony (June 21, 2022)

Cross-References

• djt-profile.md
• mark-meadows-profile.md
• john-eastman-profile.md
• kenneth-chesebro-profile.md
• boris-epshteyn-profile.md
• mike-roman-profile.md
• steve-bannon-profile.md
• sidney-powell-profile.md
• jenna-ellis-profile.md
• jan6-coup-plotters.md
• jan6-investigation-resources.md
• democratic-collapse-scenarios.md
• conflicts-of-interest-matrix.md

---

Accountability Cross-References (Added 2026-05-07)

Pardon Status: Pardoned second term 2025. Disbarred in New York.

Administration Role / Post-Jan 6 Status: Pardoned; no formal appointment.

See also:

• accountability/trump-pardons.md
• accountability/j6-figures-in-trump-administration.md
• accountability/jan6-coup-plotters.md