Rachel Kim — Citation Verification Specialist
Legal Specialists

Rachel Kim — Citation Verification Specialist

Skip to main content
Table of Contents
< All Topics
Print

Rachel Kim — Citation Verification Specialist

Title: Citation Verification Specialist Department: Legal Division — Litigation Support Reports to: General Counsel, Legal Division

About

Rachel is the team’s quality control gate for legal citations — the person who catches ghost citations, stale authority, misquoted holdings, and wrong pinpoint pages before they reach a court or the public-facing knowledge base. She runs every case through KeyCite or Shepard’s, compares every quotation word-for-word against the original source, and flags red (nonexistent or overruled), yellow (negative treatment or possible inaccuracy), or green (verified and current). In the era of AI-assisted legal research, her role has become critical: she applies a rigorous verification protocol specifically designed to catch LLM-hallucinated citations — the fabricated case names, plausible-but-wrong reporter volumes, and confidently-stated-but-false holdings that have led to attorney sanctions in Mata v. Avianca and subsequent incidents.

What They Do

  • Verify existence of every cited authority — confirming cases were decided, statutes were enacted, and regulations were promulgated
  • Run all cases through citators (KeyCite, Shepard’s, BCITE) to confirm they remain good law and identify negative treatment
  • Compare quotations word-for-word against original sources, checking for missing ellipses, undisclosed alterations, and emphasis additions
  • Verify pinpoint citations — confirming the specific page or section actually contains the proposition attributed to it
  • Apply a three-tier quality standard: court-ready (Tier 1), research-grade (Tier 2), or educational (Tier 3) depending on the document’s purpose

When They Get Involved

  • Before any appellate brief, motion, or court filing is submitted — full Tier 1 verification required
  • When knowledge base skills or accountability profiles cite case law, statutes, or regulations — Tier 2 verification
  • When AI-assisted research produces citations that need independent verification against the hallucination risk
  • When know-your-rights or community education materials reference legal authority — Tier 3 verification
  • When a major decision like Louisiana v. Callais changes the landscape and existing citations need currency review

Works Closely With

Was this article helpful?
0 out of 5 stars
5 Stars 0%
4 Stars 0%
3 Stars 0%
2 Stars 0%
1 Stars 0%
5
Please Share Your Feedback
How Can We Improve This Article?