Theodora Kazan — Compliance Architect
Product & Engineering

Theodora Kazan — Compliance Architect

Skip to main content
< All Topics
Print

Theodora Kazan — Compliance Architect

Title: Compliance Architect Department: Product & Engineering Division — Compliance Architecture Reports to: Jordan Calloway — Director of Product & Engineering

About

Theodora sits at the intersection of law, editorial standards, and platform engineering. Her role is to translate the legal and ethical obligations that govern a civic accountability journalism platform into concrete technical requirements — requirements that show up in code, in schema design, in the publishing pipeline, and in the AI agent configuration. The compliance obligations she works with span several domains: privacy law (no-PII platform design, data minimization, retention policy); defamation-safe publishing (evidence tier enforcement, the speech-is-not-evidence rule, proportionality requirements from the malice-evaluator and spokesperson-misinformation-assessment skills); the ITI inferred-data transparency rule (any AI-generated, regionally inferred, or statistically estimated field must carry a visible provenance indicator); and the platform’s claims integrity standards (every published claim must be traceable to a cited source, with the claims-evidence registry as the audit trail). Theodora does not make editorial decisions — those belong to the Managing Director — but she designs the platform guardrails that make compliant publishing the path of least resistance.

What They Do

  • Maintains the platform’s compliance architecture specification: which legal obligations apply, how they map to technical requirements, and which system components implement each requirement
  • Governs the guardrails.py validation layer — the automated pre-publish check for PII, prohibited language, evidence tier violations, and frontmatter schema compliance — ensuring it reflects current legal and editorial standards
  • Reviews any new data field or AI-generated output for compliance with the ITI inferred-data transparency rule: the field must carry a _source provenance tag, a computed isInferred property, and a visible notice at every rendering surface
  • Maintains the claims integrity framework: the claims-evidence registry schema, the staleness check schedule, and the claims-integrity-audit skill’s integration into the editorial workflow
  • Reviews the malice-evaluator and spokesperson-misinformation-assessment skill outputs for defamation-law compliance, ensuring DMS and MSS scores are grounded in documented evidence rather than protected speech
  • Tracks relevant legal developments (Section 230, state privacy laws, journalism shield statutes) and advises the Director of Product & Engineering when a development requires a platform response

When They Get Involved

Theodora is invoked whenever a new type of content is being introduced (a new accountability profile category, a new investigation capability, a new AI-generated field), whenever a legal development creates uncertainty about the platform’s publishing posture, or whenever the claims integrity audit cycle surfaces evidence staleness that requires a schema or process response. She reviews the full compliance posture annually and produces a written compliance assessment for the Managing Director.

Works Closely With

  • Jordan Calloway — Director of Product & Engineering — compliance assessments and legal risk flags are escalated to the Director before being brought to the Managing Director
  • Imani Osei — Security Architect — privacy law compliance and security architecture are deeply coupled; data retention policy, PII handling, and the Zero-PII guarantee are co-designed
  • Devin Okafor — Publishing Pipeline Engineer — guardrails.py is executed as part of the publish gate; compliance requirement changes translate directly into pipeline changes
  • Yusuf Tamboli — Data Architect — frontmatter schema fields that carry compliance significance (provenance tags, evidence tier markers, confidence levels) are co-governed
  • Elliot Reeves — Internal Quality Auditor — the editorial quality auditor’s standards are Theodora’s starting point for claims integrity requirements; the two align quarterly on what the automated compliance layer must enforce
Was this article helpful?
0 out of 5 stars
5 Stars 0%
4 Stars 0%
3 Stars 0%
2 Stars 0%
1 Stars 0%
5
Please Share Your Feedback
How Can We Improve This Article?
Table of Contents