Blaise Ingoglia – Florida State Senator
State Legislators

Blaise Ingoglia – Florida State Senator

Skip to main content
< All Topics
Print

Blaise Ingoglia – Florida State Senator

Category: State Legislator
Role: Florida State Senator, District 11 (Hernando County); formerly State Representative; former Florida Republican Party Chairman
Priority: P1 (Authored “Ultimate Cancel Act” to ban Democratic Party; voter suppression advocate; extreme partisan rhetoric)

## Role

Blaise Ingoglia, a Republican state senator from Hernando County, introduced Senate Bill 1248 in February 2023, known as “The Ultimate Cancel Act,” which would have required the Florida Division of Elections to cancel the filings of any political party that “has previously advocated for, or been in support of, slavery or involuntary servitude”—explicitly targeting the Democratic Party. He previously served as Chairman of the Republican Party of Florida (2015-2017) and as a state representative before moving to the Senate.

## Background

Ingoglia’s background as Florida Republican Party Chairman gave him experience in partisan messaging and electoral strategy before entering the Legislature. His authorship of the “Ultimate Cancel Act” reflected his willingness to propose extreme legislation that, while unlikely to pass, generated media attention and partisan conflict. His history in party leadership combined with his legislative role makes him influential in Florida Republican politics.

## Documented Actions

### 1. “Ultimate Cancel Act” to Ban Democratic Party (February 2023)

Evidence: In February 2023, Ingoglia introduced SB 1248, which would require the Florida Division of Elections to cancel the filings of any political party that had previously advocated for or supported slavery or involuntary servitude. While the bill did not explicitly name the Democratic Party, Ingoglia made clear that was his target, citing the party’s pro-slavery positions adopted during conventions in 1840, 1844, 1856, 1860, and 1864—over 160 years before his bill.

If passed, the legislation would have automatically changed the party affiliation of approximately 5 million Democratic voters to “no party affiliation,” effectively shutting them out of Florida’s closed primary elections unless they changed parties. Any canceled party could reregister with a “substantially different” name at least six months before seeking to nominate a candidate.

Ingoglia argued that if leftist activists can “cancel” people and companies for past actions, the Democratic Party should face the same standard. The Florida Democratic Party condemned it as “unconstitutional and unserious,” calling it a “publicity stunt” rather than substantive legislation. The bill failed and died in the Senate Ethics and Elections Committee on May 5, 2023.

Sources: Newsweek, February 2023; WPTV, February 2023; Florida Politics, February 2023; BillTrack50

Pattern: Extreme partisan legislation; weaponization of cancel culture rhetoric; mass disenfranchisement proposal; unconstitutional party banning

### 2. Role in Florida SB 90 Voter Suppression (2021)

Evidence: As a state representative in 2021, Ingoglia played a key role in advancing Florida Senate Bill 90, which imposed numerous voting restrictions including vote-by-mail limitations, ballot drop box restrictions, additional ID requirements, and prohibition of ballot collection. Governor Ron DeSantis signed SB 90 into law on May 6, 2021, with the bill passing along strict party lines.

SB 90 included provisions that:

– Restricted ballot drop boxes and required in-person monitoring during limited hours

– Limited the duration of mail-in ballot requests to a single election cycle (requiring voters to request ballots more frequently)

– Banned collection of multiple completed ballots by individuals

– Required additional identification when changing registration or requesting mail ballots

– Prohibited mass mailing of ballots without individual requests

While the bill was authored by Senator Dennis Baxley, Ingoglia’s involvement in shepherding it through the House demonstrated his commitment to restrictive voting policies. The legislation was characterized by voting rights organizations as voter suppression, particularly targeting methods used by Democratic-leaning constituencies.

Sources: Florida Senate website; PolitiFact, June 2021; WUSF, March 2021

Pattern: Support for comprehensive voter suppression; mail-in voting restrictions; drop box limitations

### 3. Former Florida Republican Party Chairman (2015-2017)

Evidence: Before entering the Legislature, Ingoglia served as Chairman of the Republican Party of Florida from 2015 to 2017. This role gave him oversight of Florida Republican electoral strategy during the 2016 presidential election and positioned him as a key figure in Florida GOP politics. His party chairmanship experience informed his later legislative approach, particularly his focus on partisan advantage and his willingness to propose provocative legislation like the “Ultimate Cancel Act.”

His tenure as party chairman demonstrated his commitment to aggressive partisan politics and his comfort with controversial tactics. The transition from party chair to legislator allowed him to convert partisan strategic thinking into actual legislative proposals, even when those proposals had no realistic chance of passage.

Sources: Media coverage of party chairman tenure; legislative biography

Pattern: Partisan strategic background informing legislative approach; party leadership to legislative power pipeline

Pattern Analysis

Ingoglia represents a distinct pattern within the public-corruption-ombudsman skill’s “retribution” and “democratic backsliding” categories: the legislator who proposes extreme partisan legislation that, while unlikely to pass, normalizes antidemocratic ideas and generates publicity. His “Ultimate Cancel Act” was simultaneously absurd (banning a party for actions from the 1860s) and dangerous (proposing mass disenfranchisement of 5 million voters). His pattern shows how legislators can use obviously unconstitutional proposals to shift the Overton window and generate partisan media attention.

Related profiles: bryan-hughes-profile (TX SB 1 author), barry-fleming-profile (GA SB 202 House champion), dennis-baxley-profile (FL SB 90 author), ron-desantis-profile (FL governor)

Related skills: first-amendment-legal-expert (unconstitutional party banning), fourteenth-amendment-legal-expert (equal protection and mass disenfranchisement), voting-rights-law-expert, fifth-amendment-legal-expert (due process)

Severity Assessment

Immediate harm: Moderate – “Ultimate Cancel Act” died in committee; SB 90 passed and restricted voting access Democratic erosion: High – proposed mass disenfranchisement; normalized idea of banning opposition parties; supported comprehensive voter suppression Authoritarian marker: Party banning proposal; mass disenfranchisement; weaponization of history for partisan advantage; publicity-stunt legislation


Accountability Status

Current status: Serving Florida State Senator; “Ultimate Cancel Act” failed in committee (May 2023); SB 90 in effect since May 2021 Legal exposure: None; “Ultimate Cancel Act” was not enacted; SB 90 subject to ongoing litigation but Ingoglia not individually named Public accountability: “Ultimate Cancel Act” widely ridiculed and condemned as unconstitutional; praised by Florida Republicans for provocative tactics


Cross-References

Skills: public-corruption-ombudsman, first-amendment-legal-expert, fourteenth-amendment-legal-expert, voting-rights-law-expert, fifth-amendment-legal-expert

Related profiles: bryan-hughes-profile, barry-fleming-profile, dennis-baxley-profile, ron-desantis-profile, max-burns-profile

Topics: Ultimate Cancel Act, SB 1248, Democratic Party banning, Florida SB 90, voter suppression, mail-in voting restrictions, drop box limitations, Florida Republican Party chairman, closed primary disenfranchisement, 2023 Florida Legislature, cancel culture weaponization



Investigative trail pointers (public records)

Education only — verify independently. Absence of hits is not proof.

Channel Starting points
Federal courts CourtListener / PACER party and attorney searches (spelling variants)
Campaign finance FEC + OpenSecrets for committees and donors tied to documented roles
Corporate / LLC State secretary of state; OpenCorporates for cross-border shells from reporting
Sanctions / PEP OpenSanctions when international business context is already sourced
Contracts / grants USAspending.gov for named entities from investigations

Use public-records-research-specialist, corporate-intelligence-investigator, and public-corruption-ombudsman evidence tiers.


Factual correction requests: If you believe information in this profile is incorrect, please contact factcheck@patriot.university with your name (optional), the specific claim, and any supporting documentation. We review all submissions and correct verified errors promptly.

For Trump Supporters: Questions Worth Considering

Blaise Ingoglia introduced Florida Senate Bill 1248 in February 2023 — the “Ultimate Cancel Act” — which would have required Florida to cancel the filings of any political party that had “previously advocated for, or been in support of, slavery.” He explicitly cited the Democratic Party’s positions from conventions in 1840, 1844, 1856, 1860, and 1864. If it had passed, the law would have automatically changed the party registration of approximately 5 million Florida Democratic voters to “no party affiliation,” effectively locking them out of Florida’s closed primary elections. The bill died in committee. Ingoglia was previously the Chairman of the Florida Republican Party.

Here’s a question worth sitting with: Ingoglia proposed canceling the party registrations of 5 million Americans based on the positions of their party 160 years ago. The people who would have been disenfranchised from primary elections were not those people — they are alive today and registered under a party name that has meant very different things across those 160 years. One-party systems — systems where one party cancels the legal existence of the other — have a well-documented history. They are not a feature of constitutional democracy. If a Democratic state legislator had introduced a bill to cancel the Republican Party’s registration over its historical positions on any issue, citing conventions from the 1800s and automatically changing the registration of millions of Republicans — would you consider that acceptable governance?

A second question about purpose: Ingoglia’s “Ultimate Cancel Act” had no realistic chance of passing. It died in committee. He knew that when he introduced it. The bill’s purpose was not to become law — it was to generate media coverage, demonstrate partisan combativeness, and signal to the Republican base. That’s a legitimate thing to understand about how the legislative process is sometimes used: bills are introduced not to govern but to perform. When you evaluate a legislator, it’s worth asking what percentage of their legislative activity is governing — addressing the actual problems of their actual constituents — versus performing for an audience.

Sources

  • Newsweek: “Florida Lawmaker Introduces Bill to ‘Cancel’ State’s Democratic Party” (February 2023)
  • WPTV: “Florida Sen. Blaise Ingoglia wants to ‘cancel the Democratic Party’ for previously supporting slavery” (February 2023)
  • Florida Politics: “Blaise Ingoglia bill would ‘cancel’ Democratic Party” (February 2023)
  • BillTrack50: FL S1248 tracking
  • PolitiFact: “What’s in Florida’s new election law?” (June 2, 2021)

Last Updated: May 11, 2026
Profile Status: Active monitoring – currently serving
Next Review: Quarterly

Was this article helpful?
0 out of 5 stars
5 Stars 0%
4 Stars 0%
3 Stars 0%
2 Stars 0%
1 Stars 0%
5
Please Share Your Feedback
How Can We Improve This Article?
Table of Contents