“This was one of the largest and most complex and resource-intensive investigations in our history.” — Attorney General Merrick Garland, January 6, 2024

Overview

The January 6, 2021 attack on the United States Capitol triggered what became the largest federal investigation and prosecution effort in American history. Over four years, the FBI and the Department of Justice arrested more than 1,583 individuals from all 50 states, securing convictions against approximately 1,270 of them — an 80 percent conviction rate. More than 600 defendants were charged with assaulting or impeding federal police officers.

The investigation encompassed multiple tracks: the mass prosecution of individual rioters, targeted conspiracy cases against extremist groups (Oath Keepers and Proud Boys), the appointment of Special Counsel Jack Smith to investigate Donald Trump and his co-conspirators, and parallel congressional and state investigations. It ended abruptly when Trump returned to office on January 20, 2025 and issued sweeping pardons and commutations for nearly 1,600 defendants — undoing years of convictions and pending cases in a single executive act. In 2025 and 2026, the Trump DOJ moved to erase the legal record further by vacating seditious conspiracy convictions and, in May 2026, deleting hundreds of press releases documenting J6 prosecutions from the justice.gov website.

2021: FBI Manhunt and Initial Charges

January 8–31, 2021: The FBI launched a massive identification effort, publishing thousands of photographs and videos of Capitol breach suspects to its website and soliciting tips from the public. Agents and prosecutors worked seven days a week processing the flood of tips — over 200,000 tips had come in by early February 2021. The Bureau conducted over 900 interviews in the first weeks of the investigation.

January 11, 2021: Federal prosecutors charged 13 individuals with crimes related to the Capitol breach, including former Alabama state trooper and Three Percenter militia member Larry Rendall Brock Jr. and self-described Oath Keeper Lonnie Coffman. These were the first federal charges to emerge from the attack.

January 12, 2021: The FBI’s Washington Field Office formally opened an investigation into the Capitol breach. The agency created a dedicated “Capitol Siege” Section within the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia to coordinate the unprecedented volume of cases.

January 16, 2021: Far-right Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio, who had been barred from Washington D.C. prior to January 6 after a previous arrest, was arrested in Washington D.C. on charges related to burning a Black Lives Matter banner at a church. Separately, investigators were already examining encrypted Proud Boys communications from January 5 and 6.

January 17, 2021: Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes sent messages to members of his group after the Capitol attack, referencing a plan to support Trump with force. These messages would later be central to the seditious conspiracy prosecution against Rhodes.

January 19, 2021: Proud Boys member Dominic Pezzola (known as “Spaz”) was arrested. He was among the first Proud Boys members charged for his role in the Capitol breach, including breaking a window that allowed others to enter the building.

February 2021: By February, the FBI and DOJ had charged residents of 39 states and the District of Columbia. Federal agents were making arrests of Capitol rioters at a pace of multiple per day. Charges ranged from misdemeanor trespassing to felony assault on federal officers and obstruction of an official proceeding under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2).

February 14, 2021: The second Senate impeachment trial of Donald Trump concluded with acquittal on a 57–43 vote — 10 votes short of the two-thirds needed for conviction. The Senate impeachment trial verdict did not preclude criminal prosecution. Senate Republican Minority Leader Mitch McConnell stated on the Senate floor that Trump was “practically and morally responsible” for the events of January 6, but he argued the Senate lacked jurisdiction to convict a former president.

March 2021: Prosecutors began charging more serious “seditious conspiracy” counts under 18 U.S.C. § 2384 against leaders of coordinated groups. The Oath Keepers were among the earliest groups targeted for conspiracy charges. Prosecutors alleged that the Oath Keepers had planned to use force to prevent the transfer of power.

May 2021: Attorney General Merrick Garland, confirmed in March 2021, publicly stated that the January 6 investigation was the top priority of the Justice Department. Garland said the DOJ would pursue charges “at any level” — a signal that prosecutors were pursuing leadership and organizers, not just individual rioters.

June 2021: The FBI announced it had identified more than 400 suspects in the Capitol breach investigation and had made more than 465 arrests. Prosecutors had charged defendants with more than 100 federal crimes including civil disorder, assaulting/resisting/impeding officers, obstruction of law enforcement, and obstruction of an official proceeding.

July 27, 2021: The House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol held its first public hearing, at which four Capitol police officers — Sgt. Aquilino Gonell, Officer Michael Fanone, Officer Daniel Hodges, and Officer Harry Dunn — testified about their experiences during the attack. The committee simultaneously launched extensive document requests to the Trump White House, federal agencies, and individuals.

August 2021: The House Select Committee issued subpoenas to multiple federal agencies including the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and Office of the Vice President, seeking records related to the Capitol breach and the events leading up to it.

October 13, 2021: By this date, more than 100 January 6 defendants had entered guilty pleas in the federal court system. The first wave of plea agreements covered a range of crimes including misdemeanor trespassing and civil disorder, with some defendants cooperating with authorities in exchange for reduced sentences.

October 19, 2021: The House Select Committee voted to recommend citing Steve Bannon for criminal contempt of Congress after he refused to comply with a subpoena. The full House of Representatives referred Bannon for prosecution.

November 2021: The Department of Justice created a dedicated Capitol Siege Section within the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, staffed by 130 prosecutors. The section was led by Chief Greg Rosen, who would go on to oversee more than 1,000 prosecutions.

December 2021: The first Oath Keeper seditious conspiracy indictment was handed up. The indictment charged Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes and multiple associates with seditious conspiracy for an alleged plot to use force to prevent the transfer of presidential power from Trump to Biden. It was the first use of the rarely-charged seditious conspiracy statute in connection with the Capitol attack.

---

2022: Conspiracy Cases, Contempt Prosecutions, and the Select Committee

January 6, 2022: On the one-year anniversary of the attack, DOJ announced that more than 725 people had been charged with federal crimes related to the Capitol breach. Attorney General Garland convened a press conference to announce the milestone and to reaffirm the department’s commitment to pursuing accountability, including at the leadership level.

January 12, 2022: The first Oath Keepers seditious conspiracy trial began jury selection. Eleven Oath Keepers and associates were charged with seditious conspiracy and multiple other felonies. The trial was expected to be one of the most significant J6 prosecutions to date.

January 13, 2022: A grand jury indicted former Trump White House adviser Peter Navarro and former White House spokesman Dan Scavino for contempt of Congress following their refusal to comply with subpoenas from the House Select Committee.

January 14, 2022: Mark Meadows, Trump’s final White House Chief of Staff, filed a lawsuit seeking to block the House Select Committee from obtaining his communications and testimony. The DOJ declined to pursue contempt charges against Meadows despite a committee referral.

February 14, 2022: DOJ charged Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio and four other senior Proud Boys members — Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl, and Charles Donohoe — with seditious conspiracy. The indictment alleged the group began planning to prevent the transfer of power after the 2020 election. Tarrio was charged despite not being physically present at the Capitol on January 6.

March 22, 2022: Roger Stone, Trump’s longtime political adviser and Republican operative, was subpoenaed by the House Select Committee. The committee sought Stone’s communications related to his role in coordinating Stop the Steal rally activities and contacts with the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers on January 5–6.

April 2022: Jury selection began in the trial of Guy Reffitt, a Texas Three Percenter militia member who threatened his own children if they reported him. Reffitt became the first January 6 defendant to go to trial. He was convicted on all five counts, including obstruction of an official proceeding, in March 2022.

May 4, 2022: The Supreme Court rejected former President Trump’s emergency request to block the National Archives from providing records to the House Select Committee. The court denied Trump’s application without comment.

June 3, 2022: DOJ declined to press contempt of Congress charges against Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino despite formal referrals from the House. The department stated that executive privilege assertions made the prosecutions untenable. Peter Navarro was separately indicted for contempt of Congress for defying a different subpoena.

June 9, 2022: The House Select Committee held its first major public hearing in primetime, presenting evidence about Trump’s alleged role in the January 6 attack to a national audience. The hearing featured taped depositions from former Attorney General Bill Barr, former campaign manager Bill Stepien, and others who had contradicted Trump’s claims about the election.

June 13, 2022: The House Select Committee held its second public hearing, focusing on the “Big Lie” — the campaign to spread false claims about election fraud — and the role of Trump campaign and White House officials in pushing false fraud allegations they knew to be untrue.

June 16, 2022: The House Select Committee held its third public hearing focused on Vice President Mike Pence’s role on January 6, including pressure from Trump and John Eastman to refuse to certify the Electoral College results.

June 21, 2022: The House Select Committee held its fourth public hearing, focusing on Trump’s efforts to pressure state officials in Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, and other battleground states to decertify or overturn the election results.

June 23, 2022: The House Select Committee held its fifth public hearing, focusing on the “fake electors” scheme devised by Trump lawyer John Eastman to submit false Electoral College certificates from states Biden had won.

June 28, 2022: Former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson testified in a surprise public hearing before the House Select Committee, providing dramatic firsthand testimony about events on January 6. Hutchinson testified that Trump had been told the crowd was armed, that he wanted the metal detectors removed, that he lunged at a Secret Service agent who refused to take him to the Capitol, and that White House Counsel Pat Cipollone had repeatedly warned that various Trump actions would be illegal.

July 2, 2022: The House Select Committee held its sixth public hearing focused on the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys and their planning for January 6.

July 12, 2022: The House Select Committee held its seventh public hearing, focusing on Trump’s activities during the 187 minutes of the Capitol assault — including his refusal to call off the attack.

August 2022: The Oath Keepers’ seditious conspiracy trial jury was selected and opening statements were heard. The trial centered on allegations that Rhodes and his associates had planned to use force to prevent the transfer of presidential power.

September 2022: Peter Navarro was arrested at an airport, handcuffed, and charged with two counts of criminal contempt of Congress for defying a House Select Committee subpoena. He was the highest-ranking former White House official charged with contempt.

October 2022: The Oath Keepers seditious conspiracy trial entered its final weeks. Prosecutors presented evidence including encrypted messages, social media posts, and witness testimony from cooperating Oath Keepers members about Rhodes’s planning. Rhodes testified in his own defense, a decision his lawyers would later describe as a mistake.

November 18, 2022: Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Jack Smith as Special Counsel with authority to investigate (1) Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election and his role in the January 6 Capitol attack, and (2) the handling of classified documents at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate. Smith was a veteran federal prosecutor and former chief of the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section. (Source: Department of Justice, “Attorney General Garland Appoints Jack Smith as Special Counsel,” November 18, 2022.)

November 29, 2022: The Oath Keepers seditious conspiracy jury reached a verdict. Stewart Rhodes, the founder of the Oath Keepers, and Kelly Meggs, the leader of the Florida Oath Keepers chapter, were found guilty of seditious conspiracy — one of the most serious charges available under federal law and rarely used. Three other Oath Keepers were acquitted of seditious conspiracy but convicted of other felonies. The verdict was widely described as a historic milestone in the January 6 prosecution effort. (Source: NPR, “Oath Keeper Stewart Rhodes will spend 18 years in prison, longest sentence yet,” May 25, 2023.)

December 19, 2022: The House Select Committee held its final meeting and voted to refer Donald Trump to the Department of Justice on four criminal charges: inciting insurrection (18 U.S.C. § 2383), conspiracy to defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371), obstruction of an official proceeding (18 U.S.C. § 1512), and conspiracy to make a false statement. The committee also referred Mark Meadows, Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Jeffrey Clark, and Kenneth Chesebro. The committee released its final report the same day. (Source: Ballotpedia, “Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol,” 2022.)

December 22, 2022: The House Select Committee officially released its 845-page final report, “Final Report of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol.” The report documented Trump’s multi-part plan to overturn the 2020 election, described his role in the Capitol attack, and laid out the committee’s criminal referrals. The DOJ was not bound by the referrals but could use the report’s evidence as a roadmap.

---

2023: Special Counsel Investigation and Seditious Conspiracy Sentencings

January 6, 2023: Two years after the attack, the Justice Department had charged more than 950 people with federal crimes related to January 6. Over 500 had been convicted or had pleaded guilty. The DC U.S. Attorney’s Office noted that investigations and prosecutions were ongoing.

January 12, 2023: A second group of Oath Keepers was convicted of seditious conspiracy in a separate trial. Kenneth Harrelson, Jessica Watkins, Roberto Minuta, Edward Vallejo, and David Moerschel were all convicted of seditious conspiracy or related charges. Their convictions added to the growing list of J6 defendants found guilty of the serious charge. (Source: NPR, January 2023.)

January–February 2023: The Proud Boys seditious conspiracy trial opened in federal court in Washington, D.C. Prosecutors alleged that former Proud Boys chairman Enrique Tarrio and four other leaders — Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl, and Dominic Pezzola — had conspired to use force to prevent the transfer of presidential power.

March 2023: Jack Smith’s office intensified its investigation of the Trump campaign’s activities around January 6. Prosecutors subpoenaed hundreds of documents from former New York Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik and issued multiple grand jury subpoenas related to the fake electors scheme.

May 2, 2023: Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes was sentenced to 18 years in federal prison, the longest sentence yet handed down in connection with the January 6 attack. Judge Amit Mehta applied a terrorism enhancement to Rhodes’s sentence, stating: “You, sir, present an ongoing threat and peril to this country and to the very fabric of our democracy.” Kelly Meggs received 12 years. (Source: NPR, “Oath Keeper Stewart Rhodes will spend 18 years in prison,” May 25, 2023.)

May 4, 2023: Proud Boys leaders Enrique Tarrio, Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, and Zachary Rehl were convicted of seditious conspiracy after a three-month trial. A fifth defendant, Dominic Pezzola, was acquitted of seditious conspiracy but convicted of other felonies including robbery. The convictions were a landmark victory for prosecutors who had alleged the Proud Boys planned a coordinated assault on democracy. (Source: PBS NewsHour, “Former Proud Boys leader Tarrio found guilty of Jan. 6 sedition plot,” May 2023.)

June 2023: By June 2023, 629 defendants had pleaded guilty in the January 6 prosecution. The total number charged continued to climb. Jack Smith’s office was working through multiple investigative tracks simultaneously.

June 13, 2023: Former President Donald Trump was indicted in Miami, Florida in connection with the classified documents case — the first of Jack Smith’s two investigations to produce charges. Trump was charged with 37 counts of mishandling classified documents, conspiring to obstruct justice, and making false statements. The documents case was separate from the January 6 investigation.

July 18, 2023: Special Counsel Jack Smith sent Trump a “target letter” notifying him that he was a target of the grand jury investigation into January 6. The letter was a signal that indictment was imminent.

August 1, 2023: A federal grand jury in Washington, D.C. indicted Donald Trump on four counts related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election and the January 6 Capitol attack: Conspiracy to Defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371), Obstruction of an Official Proceeding (18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2)), Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding, and Conspiracy Against Rights (18 U.S.C. § 241). The indictment named six unindicted co-conspirators: attorneys John Eastman, Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, and Kenneth Chesebro; former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark; and a political consultant believed to be Boris Epshteyn. (Source: Wikipedia, “Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (election obstruction case).”)

August 3, 2023: Trump pleaded not guilty to all four counts at his arraignment before U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan in Washington, D.C. Trump’s attorneys immediately began filing motions to dismiss the case and to disqualify Judge Chutkan.

September 2023: Proud Boys leaders received their sentences. Ethan Nordean received 18 years in prison. Joseph Biggs was sentenced to 17 years. Zachary Rehl received 15 years. Dominic Pezzola, acquitted of seditious conspiracy, received 10 years.

September 5, 2023: Former Proud Boys national chairman Enrique Tarrio was sentenced to 22 years in federal prison — the longest sentence handed down in connection with the January 6 attack. Judge Timothy Kelly cited Tarrio’s central role in directing the violent assault on the Capitol. Prosecutors had requested 33 years. (Source: NPR, “Ex-Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio gets 22 years for Jan. 6 role,” September 5, 2023.)

October–November 2023: Jack Smith’s team filed multiple briefs arguing for a trial in March 2024. Judge Chutkan set a trial date of March 4, 2024. Trump’s team sought delays and filed motions claiming presidential immunity from criminal prosecution.

December 22, 2023: U.S. District Judge Chutkan denied Trump’s request to dismiss the indictment on grounds of presidential immunity, ruling that “Presidents are not kings” and that former presidents are subject to prosecution for crimes committed in office. Trump’s attorneys immediately appealed.

---

2024: Supreme Court Rulings, Case Delays, and Election Year

January 6, 2024: Three years after the attack, the DOJ had charged more than 1,265 defendants. Over 718 had pleaded guilty — including 213 who pleaded to felonies. Another 171 had been found guilty at trial. More than 467 had been sentenced to incarceration. (Source: ABC News, “3 years later, Jan. 6 by the numbers,” January 6, 2024.)

January 9, 2024: A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard arguments on Trump’s presidential immunity claim. All three judges appeared skeptical of Trump’s broad immunity argument during oral arguments.

February 6, 2024: The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously rejected Trump’s presidential immunity claim in a 57-page opinion, ruling that “former President Trump has become citizen Trump, with all of the defenses of any other criminal defendant. But any executive immunity that may have protected him while he served as President no longer protects him against this prosecution.” Trump appealed to the Supreme Court.

February 28, 2024: The Supreme Court agreed to hear Trump’s presidential immunity appeal, guaranteeing the case would not go to trial before the November 2024 election. The court’s decision to take the case pushed the trial beyond the election — effectively insulating Trump from a J6 verdict during the campaign.

March 2024: With the trial delayed by the Supreme Court’s immunity review, Jack Smith’s team filed new court papers detailing the evidence against Trump, which included evidence that Trump had been told the election fraud claims were false and that he had knowingly pressured Pence, state officials, and others to obstruct the certification.

April 25, 2024: The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Trump v. United States, the presidential immunity case. The conservative majority signaled sympathy for a broad immunity doctrine, suggesting that official acts of a president could be immune from prosecution.

May 2024: By May 2024, more than 1,400 people had been charged with federal crimes related to the Capitol attack, and over 900 had been convicted. The investigations were still ongoing, with FBI agents continuing to identify and arrest new suspects years after the attack.

June 28, 2024: The Supreme Court issued two major rulings affecting January 6 prosecutions: (1) In Fischer v. United States, the court ruled 6–3 that the federal obstruction statute (18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2)) was limited to evidence-tampering conduct, not mere participation in the Capitol breach. The ruling potentially affected more than 355 J6 defendants who had been charged under that statute. (Source: SCOTUSblog, “Justices rule for Jan. 6 defendant,” June 2024.) (2) The same day the Court issued its immunity ruling.

July 1, 2024: The Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in Trump v. United States, holding 6–3 that former presidents have immunity from criminal prosecution for “official acts” taken while in office. The ruling did not dismiss the Trump indictment outright but required Judge Chutkan to determine which alleged conduct fell within “official acts” — a process that could take months or years. The ruling also placed restrictions on what evidence could be used against Trump, including statements he made in his capacity as president. (Source: Supreme Court opinion, 23-939 Trump v. United States, July 1, 2024.)

July 15, 2024: U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon (a Trump appointee) dismissed the classified documents case against Trump in Florida, ruling that Jack Smith had been unlawfully appointed as Special Counsel. The ruling was widely criticized by legal scholars as contradicting decades of precedent on special counsel appointments. Smith appealed.

August 27, 2024: Jack Smith filed a superseding indictment in the January 6 case, revising the charging document to conform to the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling by removing references to Trump’s official acts while keeping the core charges intact. Smith argued the revised indictment was fully constitutional and prosecutable.

September 2024: With the November election approaching, Jack Smith’s team filed a brief arguing for a trial before the election. Judge Chutkan reviewed what conduct qualified as “official” versus “unofficial” under the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling. The review process delayed trial further.

November 5, 2024: Donald Trump won the presidential election, defeating Democratic nominee Vice President Kamala Harris. Under longstanding DOJ policy, sitting presidents cannot be indicted or tried for federal crimes. Trump’s election effectively ended the federal January 6 prosecution against him.

November 25, 2024: Special Counsel Jack Smith moved to dismiss all federal charges against Donald Trump in both the January 6 case and the classified documents case, citing the DOJ policy against prosecuting a sitting president. “The Government respectfully requests that the Court dismiss the superseding indictment and direct that the judgment of dismissal be entered without prejudice,” Smith’s brief stated. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan formally dismissed the January 6 case the same day. The classified documents case in Florida was also dismissed. (Source: Ballotpedia, “Federal prosecution of Donald Trump, 2023–2024.”)

December 2024: Jack Smith submitted two volumes of his final report on the Trump investigations to Attorney General Garland. Volume One covered the January 6 investigation. Trump’s attorneys attempted to block the release of the report, filing emergency motions in multiple federal courts. Most courts rejected the attempts, allowing at least partial release.

December 17, 2024: House Administration Subcommittee Chairman Barry Loudermilk released a second interim report recommending criminal referrals against former Representative Liz Cheney, alleging she had misled the Select Committee. The report was widely criticized as a partisan effort to retaliate against Republican critics of Trump. (Source: House Committee on Administration press release, December 17, 2024.)

---

2025: Trump Returns, Pardons, and Dismantling the Record

January 6, 2025: On the fourth anniversary of the Capitol attack, the Justice Department reported that it had made 1,570 total arrests and was still trying to secure guilty pleas in approximately 300 pending cases. Attorney General Garland delivered remarks reaffirming the department’s commitment to accountability.

January 7, 2025: Jack Smith formally resigned as Special Counsel after submitting his final report to Attorney General Garland. His resignation was expected following Trump’s election, which made both cases against the president-elect untenable under DOJ policy. Smith had served as Special Counsel for approximately 26 months. (Source: ABC News, “Timeline: Special counsel’s probe into Trump’s efforts to overturn 2020 election.”)

January 9, 2025: The DOJ released Volume One of Jack Smith’s final report on the January 6 investigation, covering his investigation of Trump’s role in the Capitol attack. The report concluded that “the Government had and has sufficient evidence to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial” against Trump and described in detail Trump’s alleged conduct in the effort to overturn the 2020 election. It characterized Trump’s conduct as “an unprecedented assault on the structure of our government.” (Source: Department of Justice, “Report of Special Counsel Smith Volume 1,” January 2025.)

January 20, 2025: Donald Trump was inaugurated as the 47th President of the United States. On the evening of his first day back in office, Trump signed a presidential proclamation (No. 10887) granting blanket pardons and commutations to nearly 1,600 people charged with crimes related to January 6, 2021. The proclamation: (1) granted full pardons to more than 1,200 people convicted of or awaiting trial for J6-related offenses; (2) commuted to time served the sentences of 14 individuals convicted of seditious conspiracy, including Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes, Kelly Meggs, Kenneth Harrelson, Thomas Caldwell, Jessica Watkins, Roberto Minuta, Edward Vallejo, David Moerschel, Joseph Hackett, and Proud Boys leaders Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl, Dominic Pezzola, and Jeremy Bertino; (3) ordered the DOJ to dismiss all pending cases against J6 defendants. (Source: White House, “Granting Pardons and Commutation of Sentences,” January 20, 2025; Lawfare, “Trump Pardons or Commutes Terms of All Jan. 6 Rioters,” January 20, 2025.)

January 20, 2025 (following pardons): Multiple convicted rioters, including those who had violently assaulted police officers, were released from federal prison. Stewart Rhodes — who had been sentenced to 18 years and described by his sentencing judge as “an ongoing threat and peril to this country” — was freed. Enrique Tarrio — sentenced to 22 years for organizing the seditious conspiracy — walked out of prison. Both men appeared publicly in Washington, D.C. in the following days.

January 20, 2025: The DOJ ordered dismissal of all pending January 6 cases in federal court. Cases that had survived trial, awaited sentencing, or were in various stages of prosecution were abruptly terminated. Some federal judges expressed frustration at the dismissals.

February 2025: Convicted rioters who had been imprisoned for violent assaults on police officers began appearing at public events and social media posts celebrating their release. Multiple recidivism incidents were documented — including new violent offenses — in the weeks and months following the pardons. (Source: House Judiciary Committee Democrats, “Where Are They Now,” 2025; House Judiciary Committee Democrats staff report, 2026.)

February 21, 2025: Stewart Rhodes, Kelly Meggs, Enrique Tarrio, and Joseph Biggs held a press conference outside the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. — the scene of their crimes — celebrating their pardons and freedom.

April 2025: The Trump DOJ, under Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, filed an unopposed motion with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit asking the court to vacate the seditious conspiracy convictions of Oath Keepers and Proud Boys leaders. The department argued that the convictions had been obtained improperly under a Biden DOJ that had “weaponized” federal law enforcement. (Source: PBS NewsHour, “DOJ moves to erase seditious conspiracy convictions,” 2025.)

Late April/May 2025: The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the DOJ’s unopposed request, vacating the seditious conspiracy convictions of Oath Keepers and Proud Boys leaders who had been among the most serious J6 defendants. The convictions — which had been upheld on multiple appeals — were erased from the legal record. The DOJ then moved to formally dismiss the cases against those group members. (Source: Guardian, “Trump’s justice department scrubs its website of news releases about January 6 defendants,” May 2026; CBS News, May 2026.)

May 19, 2026: The DOJ, under Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, announced the creation of a “$1.776 billion anti-weaponization fund” designed to compensate individuals who claimed they were unfairly investigated or prosecuted by the federal government under the Biden administration. The fund was widely interpreted as a vehicle to compensate January 6 defendants and Trump allies. Former Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio stated publicly that he expected to receive “somewhere in the mid-tens of millions” in compensation. The announcement drew bipartisan condemnation in Congress. (Source: TIME, “What to Know About the DOJ’s $1.8B ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’,” May 2026; PBS NewsHour, May 2026.)

---

2026: Erasure of the Historical Record

May 22–24, 2026: The Department of Justice quietly began removing press releases and public records documenting January 6 prosecutions from the justice.gov website. A journalist first noted the deletions on social media. When confronted, the DOJ’s Rapid Response social media account confirmed the deletions, stating: “We are proud to reverse the DOJ’s weaponization under the Biden administration. We will do everything in our power to make whole those who were persecuted for political purposes. This includes stripping DOJ’s website of partisan propaganda.” (Source: USA Today, “DOJ deletes info about Jan. 6 arrests, charges, convictions,” May 24, 2026; NBC News, “Justice Department deletes press releases on charges against Jan. 6 rioters”; Guardian, May 23, 2026.)

May 22, 2026: Among the press releases deleted from justice.gov were announcements about: the indictments and convictions of Oath Keepers and Proud Boys leaders for seditious conspiracy; individual arrests and convictions of rioters who assaulted police officers; charging announcements for those who brought weapons or used violence; and case updates documenting the progression of the largest federal investigation in American history. The DOJ’s Rapid Response account described the deleted materials as “partisan propaganda.”

May 22, 2026: The deletions were the latest step in a systematic effort by the Trump administration to rewrite the history of January 6, following the mass pardons (January 2025), the vacating of seditious conspiracy convictions (April–May 2025), the dismissal of all pending cases (January 2025), and the creation of a compensation fund for rioters (May 2026).

May 24, 2026: A review by USA Today found that some J6 press releases remained on the DOJ website, including announcements about Oath Keepers and Proud Boys leaders pleading guilty to seditious conspiracy (prior to trial), an announcement that 13 people were charged two days after the attack, then-Acting AG Jeffrey Rosen’s January 7, 2021 statement about the breach, and AG Garland’s two-year anniversary statement. (Source: USA Today, May 24, 2026.)

Late May 2026: Following the D.C. Circuit’s vacatur of the seditious conspiracy convictions, the DOJ moved to formally dismiss the underlying criminal cases against Oath Keepers and Proud Boys members, erasing the charges from the federal docket. The dismissals were the final step in the legal erasure of the seditious conspiracy prosecution record — from conviction, to commutation, to vacatur, to case dismissal — a sequence completed across approximately 16 months. (Source: CBS News, “DOJ says it scrubbed news releases about Jan. 6 criminal cases from its website,” May 2026.)

May 29, 2026: A federal judge in the Eastern District of Virginia issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) blocking the DOJ’s newly established Anti-Weaponization Fund from processing or paying any claims while legal challenges proceed. The TRO was granted in a suit filed by Brendan Ballou — a former DOJ prosecutor who had tried several January 6 cases — on behalf of two Capitol Police officers who responded to the January 6 attack. The officers argued that the fund would “directly finance the violent operations of rioters, paramilitaries, and their supporters.” The case was one of at least three lawsuits challenging the fund. (Source: Boston Globe, “Capitol rioters clamor for payouts from Trump’s new ‘anti-weaponization’ fund despite backlash,” May 30, 2026; NBC News, May 2026.)

May 29, 2026: A fired January 6 prosecutor and a law professor acquitted in a federal case brought by the Trump administration jointly filed a separate lawsuit challenging the Anti-Weaponization Fund, arguing that the fund creates a politically discriminatory process that excludes certain individuals who claim they were mistreated by Republican officials. Senate Republicans, angry about the fund’s creation, met with Acting AG Todd Blanche and signaled they would seek to impose congressional parameters on the fund through a Department of Homeland Security spending bill. (Source: NBC News, “Justice Department deletes press releases on charges against Jan. 6 rioters,” May 2026.)

May 30–31, 2026: A growing list of prospective applicants for the Anti-Weaponization Fund became public, including January 6 defendants and political allies of Trump. Among those reported to be exploring or seeking claims: former Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio (who previously said he expected “somewhere in the mid-tens of millions”); MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell; former Trump adviser Michael Caputo; former Trump attorney Michael Cohen; and former Republican congressman George Santos. Acting AG Blanche stated publicly that there were “no limits” on who could apply and declined to rule out payments to defendants convicted of January 6 violence. No application process had been finalized and no payments had been made, with the fund remaining blocked by the Virginia TRO. (Source: Salon, “Santos, Lindell, Proud Boys eye Trump’s $1.8B fund,” May 31, 2026; Boston Globe, May 30, 2026.)

May 2026: The Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine and journalists at multiple outlets had begun systematically archiving DOJ press releases related to January 6 prosecutions. The Wayback Machine preserved thousands of pages that the government deleted or altered. Researchers and journalists documented the scope of the deletions. (Source: CNN, “The ‘Wayback Machine’ is preserving the websites Trump’s White House took down,” February 2025.)

---

Deleted DOJ Documents: An Accounting

The following categories of DOJ content related to January 6 prosecutions were removed from the justice.gov website beginning in May 2026, as documented by multiple news organizations:

Press releases deleted:

• Individual charging announcements for January 6 defendants (hundreds of individual releases documenting specific arrests and charges)
• Announcements of seditious conspiracy convictions for Oath Keepers and Proud Boys leaders tried in 2022–2023
• Sentencing announcements for the highest-profile J6 cases, including Rhodes (18 years) and Tarrio (22 years)
• DOJ statements marking the one-, two-, three-, and four-year anniversaries of the attack
• Press releases documenting the charging waves of 2021, 2022, and 2023

What survived (as of May 24, 2026, per USA Today review):

• Oath Keepers and Proud Boys leaders’ guilty pleas to seditious conspiracy (prior to trial convictions)
• January 8, 2021 announcement of the first 13 charges
• Acting AG Jeffrey Rosen’s January 7, 2021 statement
• AG Garland’s two-year anniversary statement

Archival resources:

• Internet Archive Wayback Machine: Multiple journalists have preserved individual press releases at web.archive.org
• NPR January 6 visual archive: apps.npr.org/jan-6-archive (updated through January 20, 2025)
• ProPublica, Lawfare, and Just Security maintained their own documentation databases
• The House Select Committee’s final report and evidence archive remains available through Congress.gov

---

The Recidivism Record

Multiple congressional investigations documented cases in which January 6 defendants who received presidential pardons went on to commit additional crimes. A January 2026 House Judiciary Committee Democrats staff report documented 23 pardoned J6 defendants who subsequently committed crimes including: plotting the murder of FBI agents; violent assault; strangulation; burglary; stalking; stabbing; felony DWI; possession of child sexual abuse material; and reckless DUI homicide. President Trump pardoned all 23 for their J6-related offenses without conditions. (Source: House Judiciary Committee Democrats staff report, “One Year Later: January 6th Pardons,” January 2026.)

---

Prosecution Statistics Summary

Metric	Count	Source
Total arrested (through Jan. 20, 2025)	1,583	Lawfare, 2025
Total convicted	~1,270 (80%)	Lawfare, 2025
Pleaded guilty	1,009 (64% of arrested)	Lawfare, 2025
Found guilty at trial	221	Lawfare, 2025
Convicted via stipulated trial	40	Lawfare, 2025
Sentenced to incarceration	608+	ABC News, Jan. 6, 2024
Charged with assault on officers	608 (38%)	Lawfare, 2025
Charged with seditious conspiracy	Multiple leaders across Oath Keepers and Proud Boys	DOJ records
Pardoned/commuted by Trump (Jan. 20, 2025)	~1,600	White House proclamation
Pending cases dismissed	~300	DOJ, January 2025
Seditious conspiracy convictions vacated (2025)	Multiple Oath Keepers/Proud Boys leaders	D.C. Circuit, 2025

---

Basis for Inclusion

This document chronicles the DOJ’s January 6, 2021 investigation as an institution — tracking federal prosecutorial conduct, court proceedings, legislative investigations, and executive clemency actions. As an investigation of documented federal law enforcement activity, it meets Patriot University’s inclusion standards without requiring private-citizen screening. All individuals named are public figures acting in their public capacities, and all events are documented through court records, official government releases, and verified journalism.

---

Pattern Analysis

The DOJ’s January 6 investigation demonstrates a clear pattern: the largest, most resource-intensive federal investigation in American history produced a historic conviction rate (80%), prosecuted organized extremism through rare seditious conspiracy charges, and secured sentences of up to 22 years for ringleaders — only to be entirely reversed by the return to power of the subject of the investigation’s most serious prosecutorial track. The investigation’s abrupt termination through mass pardons, the vacating of convictions, and the deletion of the public record represents an unprecedented use of executive clemency to undo accountability for organized political violence.

---

TRC Considerations

The DOJ January 6 prosecution record — including court filings, evidence files, defendant cooperation agreements, and sentencing memoranda — constitutes critical primary source material for any future truth and reconciliation process. Archivists, journalists, civil society organizations, and libraries should prioritize preservation of all court records through PACER and CourtListener before further deletions occur. The court records are public and are not subject to executive deletion, though some sealed materials may become inaccessible over time.

---

Investigative Trail Pointers

• PACER/CourtListener: All federal criminal dockets remain publicly accessible. Search for “Capitol Breach” cases in the D.C. District Court (district: dcd).
• NPR January 6 Archive: apps.npr.org/jan-6-archive — defendant-level database maintained through January 20, 2025.
• Wayback Machine: web.archive.org — search for deleted justice.gov press releases.
• Democracy Docket: democracydocket.com — tracks related civil litigation.
• Lawfare: lawfaremedia.org — extensive legal analysis and case tracking.
• Just Security: justsecurity.org — detailed tracking of immunity litigation and its effects.
• House Select Committee Report: Available through congress.gov and January6th.house.gov archive.
• Jack Smith Final Report (Volume 1): Available at justice.gov/storage/Report-of-Special-Counsel-Smith-Volume-1-January-2025.pdf (archived).

---

Cross-References

• January 6 Investigation Resources — Source catalog of investigation resources
• January 6th Coup Plotters and Co-Conspirators — Profiles of January 6 coup plotters and co-conspirators
• January 6th Pardons Tracker: Recidivism and Accountability — Detailed pardon tracker and recidivism documentation
• January 6 Implicated Figures in the Trump Administration (2025–Present) — J6-linked figures who entered the 2025 Trump administration

---

Sources

1. U.S. Department of Justice, “Statement of Acting Attorney General Jeffrey A. Rosen Regarding the Violence at the U.S. Capitol,” January 7, 2021. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/statement-acting-attorney-general-jeffrey-rosen-regarding-violence-us-capitol (archived: web.archive.org)

1. Wikipedia, “Criminal proceedings in the January 6 United States Capitol attack,” updated 2026. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_proceedings_in_the_January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack

1. ABC News, “3 years later, Jan. 6 by the numbers: More than 1,200 charged, more than 460 imprisoned for role in Capitol attack,” January 6, 2024. https://abcnews.com/Politics/3-years-jan-6-numbers-1200-charged-460/story

1. Lawfare, “The High-Water Mark of the Jan. 6 Prosecutions,” 2025. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-high-water-mark-of-the-jan.-6-prosecutions

1. NPR, “Oath Keeper Stewart Rhodes will spend 18 years in prison, longest sentence yet,” May 25, 2023. https://www.npr.org/2023/05/25/1178116193/stewart-rhodes-oath-keepers-verdict

1. NPR, “Ex-Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio gets 22 years for Jan. 6 role,” September 5, 2023. https://www.npr.org/2023/09/05/1197202616/enrique-tarrio-proud-boys-jan-6-sentence

1. ABC News, “Former Proud Boys chairman Enrique Tarrio convicted of seditious conspiracy,” September 5, 2023. https://abcnews.com/Politics/former-proud-boys-chairman-enrique-tarrio-convicted-seditious/story

1. PBS NewsHour, “Former Proud Boys leader Tarrio found guilty of Jan. 6 sedition plot,” May 2023. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/former-proud-boys-leader-tarrio-found-guilty-of-jan-6-sedition-plot

1. PBS NewsHour, “Rhodes and other Oath Keepers will be sentenced for seditious conspiracy in Jan. 6 attack,” 2023. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/rhodes-and-other-oath-keepers-will-be-sentenced-for-seditious-conspiracy-in-jan-6-attack

1. Wikipedia, “Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (election obstruction case),” updated 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_prosecution_of_Donald_Trump_(election_obstruction_case)

1. Wikipedia, “Smith special counsel investigation,” updated 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_special_counsel_investigation

1. Ballotpedia, “Federal prosecution of Donald Trump, 2023–2024 (2020 election certification case).” https://ballotpedia.org/Federal_prosecution_of_Donald_Trump,_2023-2024_(2020_election_certification_case)

1. ABC News, “Timeline: Special counsel’s probe into Trump’s efforts to overturn 2020 election.” https://abcnews.com/US/timeline-special-counsels-probe-trumps-efforts-overturn-2020/story

1. U.S. Department of Justice, “Report of Special Counsel Smith Volume 1,” January 2025. https://www.justice.gov/storage/Report-of-Special-Counsel-Smith-Volume-1-January-2025.pdf

1. SCOTUSblog, “Justices rule for Jan. 6 defendant,” June 2024. https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/justices-rule-for-jan-6-defendant

1. U.S. Supreme Court, Fischer v. United States, 23-5572, June 28, 2024. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-5572_l6hn.pdf

1. U.S. Supreme Court, Trump v. United States, 23-939, July 1, 2024. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

1. Just Security, “The Limited Effects of Fischer: DOJ Data Reveals Supreme Court’s Narrowing of Jan. 6th Obstruction Charges Will Have Minimal Impact,” 2024. https://www.justsecurity.org/96493/supreme-court-obstruction-january-6th

1. White House, “Granting Pardons and Commutation of Sentences for Certain Offenses Relating to the Events at or Near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021,” January 20, 2025. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/granting-pardons-and-commutation-of-sentences-relating-to-the-events-at-or-near-the-united-states-capitol-on-january-6-2021/

1. Lawfare, “Trump Pardons or Commutes Terms of All Jan. 6 Rioters,” January 20, 2025. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/trump-pardons-or-commutes-terms-of-all-jan.-6-rioters

1. Wikipedia, “Pardon of January 6 United States Capitol attack defendants,” updated 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pardon_of_January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack_defendants

1. NPR, “Trump pardons some 1,500 Jan. 6 rioters, commutes 14 sentences,” January 20, 2025. https://www.npr.org/2025/01/20/g-s1-36809/trump-pardons-january-6-riot

1. PBS NewsHour, “DOJ moves to erase seditious conspiracy convictions of Oath Keepers, Proud Boys in Jan. 6 cases,” 2025. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/doj-moves-to-erase-seditious-conspiracy-convictions-of-oath-keepers-proud-boys-in-jan-6-cases

1. U.S. Department of Justice, “Clemency Grants by President Donald J. Trump (2025–Present).” https://www.justice.gov/pardon/clemency-grants-president-donald-j-trump-2025-present

1. USA Today, “DOJ deletes info about Jan. 6 arrests, charges, convictions,” May 24, 2026. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/05/24/justice-department-january-6-capitol-riot-news-releases-info/90245830007

1. NBC News, “Justice Department deletes press releases on charges against Jan. 6 rioters,” May 2026. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/justice-department-deletes-press-releases-charges-jan-6-rioters-rcna346613

1. The Guardian, “Trump’s justice department scrubs its website of news releases about January 6 defendants,” May 23, 2026. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/23/trump-justice-department-scrubs-website-january-6-defendants

1. CBS News, “DOJ says it scrubbed news releases about Jan. 6 criminal cases from its website,” May 2026. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doj-scrubbed-january-6-news-releases-website

1. TIME, “Justice Department Removes News Releases on Jan. 6 Prosecutions From Website,” May 25, 2026. https://time.com/article/2026/05/25/doj-jan-6-attack-prosecutions-news-releases-removed

1. TIME, “What to Know About the DOJ’s $1.8B ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’,” May 2026. https://time.com/article/2026/05/18/trump-doj-anti-weaponization-fund-irs-lawsuit-settlement

1. Wikipedia, “2025 United States government online resource removals,” 2025–2026. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_government_online_resource_removals

1. CNN, “The ‘Wayback Machine’ is preserving the websites Trump’s White House took down,” February 18, 2025. https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/tech/internet-archives-deleted-websites-wayback-machine

1. NPR, January 6 Visual Archive. apps.npr.org/jan-6-archive (maintained through January 20, 2025.)

1. House Judiciary Committee Democrats, “Where Are They Now,” 2025. http://democrats-judiciary.house.gov/where-are-they-now

1. House Judiciary Committee Democrats Staff Report, “One Year Later: January 6th Pardons,” January 2026. https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU00/20260108/118805/HMKP-119-JU00-20260108-SD007.pdf

1. Ballotpedia, “Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol.” https://ballotpedia.org/Select_Committee_to_Investigate_the_January_6th_Attack_on_the_United_States_Capitol

1. Department of Justice, “Attorney General Garland Appoints Jack Smith as Special Counsel,” November 18, 2022. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-garland-appoints-jack-smith-special-counsel

1. DOJ, “Justice Department Announces Anti-Weaponization Fund,” May 2026. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-anti-weaponization-fund

1. Congress.gov, “Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol,” Library of Congress. https://www.congress.gov/committee/house-select-committee-to-investigate-the-january-6th-attack-on-the-united-states-capitol/hlij00

1. Congress.gov CRS, “Fischer v. United States: Supreme Court Reads Federal Obstruction Provision Narrowly in Capitol Breach Prosecution,” 2024. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB11126

1. Boston Globe, “Capitol rioters clamor for payouts from Trump’s new ‘anti-weaponization’ fund despite backlash,” May 30, 2026. https://www.bostonglobe.com/2026/05/30/nation/capitol-rioters-clamor-payouts-trumps-new-anti-weaponization-fund-despite-backlash/

1. Salon, “Santos, Lindell, Proud Boys eye Trump’s $1.8B fund,” May 31, 2026. https://www.salon.com/2026/05/31/santos-lindell-proud-boys-eye-trumps-1-8b-fund/

---

Last Updated: May 31, 2026 Factcheck Notice: This document relies on government records, court filings, and journalism from established news organizations. Readers should note that some DOJ press releases cited herein have been deleted from justice.gov; archived versions are available at web.archive.org. Court records remain available through PACER and CourtListener.