Operation Pickpocket — Trump Administration Immigrant Financial Exclusion Campaign
Overview
This document tracks Operation Pickpocket — a covert government investigation into immigrant bank accounts — and the broader Trump administration campaign to exclude immigrants from the U.S. financial system. The investigation’s own findings undercut its premise: it failed to document widespread fraud, determining instead that most accounts were opened lawfully. Nevertheless, the administration used the financial system as an immigration enforcement tool, culminating in Executive Order 14406 (May 19, 2026), which designated ITIN use as a suspicious activity “red flag” and directed regulators to help conscript banks as immigration enforcement agents.
This tracker matters because:
- It documents a government investigation launched to justify a predetermined policy outcome
- It exposes financial exclusion as a deliberate immigration enforcement strategy (“attrition through pressure”)
- It affects an estimated 4.4 million+ ITIN taxpayers, many with legal status, plus their dependents and communities
- It represents a significant reorientation of U.S. banking regulation away from financial crime toward immigration enforcement
Stated Objectives
Official Government Framing
The White House described EO 14406 as protecting “America’s financial system from illicit activity” and addressing “credit risks posed by extending financial services to non-work authorized illegal aliens.” (White House Fact Sheet, May 19, 2026)
The administration presented the order as a response to genuine financial crimes, citing:
- Terrorism financing
- Drug trafficking
- Money laundering (specifically citing Chinese-linked networks)
- Fentanyl-related financial activity tied to Mexico-based cartels
- Labor trafficking
- Payroll tax evasion by employers hiring undocumented workers
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated that “there should be stricter rules to open bank accounts,” framing the executive order as a consumer and systemic protection measure. He was directed under the EO to issue formal guidance to financial institutions within 60 days of signing.
White House Fact Sheet Claims
The White House fact sheet (May 19, 2026) asserted:
- “Gaps in customer identification practices have allowed terrorists, drug traffickers, money launderers, and other criminal networks to exploit U.S. financial institutions to move illicit funds and evade law enforcement.”
- “Chinese money laundering networks have used U.S.-based accounts to launder over $312 billion for criminal organizations, including to finance human trafficking.”
- “Financial trend analyses have uncovered hubs of illicit fentanyl-related financial activity in the United States tied to Mexico-based cartels.”
Analytical note: The White House fact sheet does not establish a causal link between ITIN-based accounts and the cited criminal activity. Operation Pickpocket’s own internal findings — that most accounts were lawfully opened — undercut the evidentiary basis for treating ITIN use as a reliable indicator of the fraud the fact sheet describes.
Who Was Targeted and Impacted
ITIN Holders: A Critical Distinction
The IRS created Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers specifically so that people ineligible for Social Security numbers could comply with federal tax law. ITIN holders include:
- Nonresident aliens with U.S. tax filing obligations
- Foreign nationals with U.S. investment income
- Legal immigrants and visa holders ineligible for SSNs
- Spouses and dependents of U.S. citizens or resident aliens
- Undocumented immigrants who choose to pay taxes
Approximately 4.4 million ITIN filers pay an estimated $11.74 billion in federal taxes annually. Many are longtime, law-abiding residents with full legal authorization to work.
Account Types Targeted
- Checking and savings accounts opened with ITIN instead of SSN
- Accounts opened with foreign consular identification cards (e.g., the Mexican matrícula consular)
- Mortgage loans and auto loans extended to ITIN holders
- Credit cards and other consumer credit products
Workers with Temporary Legal Status
EO 14406 explicitly targets individuals the administration characterizes as having a “substantial loss-of-wage risk” — a category that can include workers on temporary visas, people with pending asylum applications, and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) holders. These are individuals with legal presence in the United States, not undocumented immigrants.
Documented Case: Raquel Molina
The New York Times (May 30, 2026) reported the case of Raquel Molina, a Salvadoran immigrant who held a valid Social Security number and full work authorization. Despite her legal status, she was fired from her 28-year job as an airport cleaning worker at Logan Airport — illustrating that the administration’s financial and employment pressure campaign was sweeping up legal immigrants who never touched an ITIN-based bank account. Her case reflects the broader chilling effect: immigration enforcement pressure affecting people regardless of legal status.
Legal Framework: What the Law Actually Says
IRS Rules on ITINs
The Internal Revenue Service created the ITIN program explicitly to enable tax compliance by people who cannot obtain SSNs. Per IRS guidance:
- ITINs are available to any individual who has a federal tax filing requirement regardless of immigration status
- Obtaining an ITIN does not confer legal status or work authorization
- ITINs do not make someone eligible for SSA benefits, EITC, or most federal programs
- The IRS issues ITINs precisely because it prefers people pay taxes over going underground
The National Immigration Law Center and the American Immigration Council both confirm: an ITIN “does not confer legal status or work authorization. It exists because the government wanted people to pay taxes, and they did.” (as cited in Steven Boardman, The Bank Account as Border Checkpoint, May 2026)
Federal Law on Bank Account Access
No federal law prohibits financial institutions from opening accounts for customers who present ITINs or foreign consular IDs. Prior to EO 14406, the existing Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and Know Your Customer (KYC) framework already required banks to:
- Verify customer identity using government-issued documents
- Maintain customer due diligence records
- File Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) when warranted
Consular identification cards (such as the matrícula consular) are recognized by the U.S. State Department and many state governments as valid identification documents. They are not, in themselves, indicators of illegal activity.
Bank Secrecy Act and Know Your Customer Standards
The BSA’s existing Customer Identification Program (CIP) rules, at 31 C.F.R. § 1020.220, already required banks to collect and verify identifying information for customers opening accounts. Banks complying with those rules had no legal obligation to turn away ITIN holders.
EO 14406 directed the Treasury Secretary to propose changes to BSA regulations — acknowledging that existing law did not support the policy the administration wanted to impose.
Right to Financial Privacy Act
The Right to Financial Privacy Act (12 U.S.C. §§ 3401–3422) restricts government access to customer financial records. Federal courts have separately ruled to block IRS sharing of ITIN filer data with DHS/ICE, protecting taxpayer privacy during the 2026 filing season. (Source: multiple press reports, May 2026)
The Government’s Arguments
The administration offered several justifications for the Operation Pickpocket investigation and EO 14406:
1. Money laundering and terrorism financing: The White House cited Chinese-linked money laundering networks and fentanyl cartel financial activity as evidence of systemic vulnerability in U.S. banks.
2. Payroll tax evasion: The order identifies employers who pay workers off the books, misuse identification numbers, or fail to withhold payroll taxes — framing ITIN-holder accounts as potential conduits for employer misconduct.
3. Credit risk to the financial system: The EO argued that lending to individuals who face deportation risk creates an “ability to repay” deficiency that constitutes a structural threat to bank soundness.
4. Identity misrepresentation and fraud: The government cited “gaps in customer identification practices” as the systemic vulnerability that Operation Pickpocket was designed to document.
5. Labor trafficking: The White House fact sheet linked some account patterns to labor trafficking operations.
Critical evidentiary problem with all of these arguments: Operation Pickpocket’s own investigative findings, as reported by the New York Times (May 30, 2026), showed that most accounts were lawfully opened. The investigation failed to establish the widespread fraud that would be needed to justify treating ITIN use itself as a reliable suspicious activity indicator.
What Research and Evidence Actually Shows
Operation Pickpocket’s Own Findings
The most important evidence comes from the investigation itself. Per The New York Times (May 30, 2026, “Trump Squeezes Immigrants by Cutting Them Off From Jobs, Health Care and Housing,” by Nicholas Nehamas, Miriam Jordan, Coral Davenport, Hamed Aleaziz, Lydia DePillis, and Zolan Kanno-Youngs):
“The investigation, called Operation Pickpocket, failed to document widespread fraud, instead finding that most people had lawfully opened the accounts.”
This finding means the administration chose to proceed with a sweeping policy — EO 14406 and its downstream guidance — despite its own investigation finding insufficient evidentiary basis for the characterization of ITIN-based accounts as predominantly fraudulent.
ITIN Taxpayer Contributions
ITIN filers contribute approximately $11.74 billion in federal taxes annually. The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy has documented that undocumented immigrants as a whole pay substantial federal, state, and local taxes — often including payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare programs they will never receive. Treating these taxpayers as inherently suspicious inverts the original purpose of the ITIN program.
Consequences of Being “Unbanked”
Research consistently documents that financial exclusion — being forced out of the banking system — causes cascading harm:
- Reliance on check-cashing services that charge high fees
- Inability to build credit history, disqualifying people from mortgages and car loans
- Vulnerability to cash theft
- Inability to receive direct deposit, making wage theft easier
- Barriers to accessing rental housing (most landlords require bank accounts for rent payment)
- Exclusion from online commerce
The policy effectively reduces workers to economic second-class status regardless of legal immigration standing.
Banking Industry Concerns
American Banker (May 2026) reported that bank and credit union trade associations responded to EO 14406 with “cautious relief” that it stopped short of requiring banks to check every customer’s citizenship — a proposal reportedly considered and tabled after industry pushback. However, the industry continued to warn that implementing agencies’ interpretation of the order would determine its ultimate compliance burden, and that excessive requirements would increase costs passed on to all consumers.
The banking industry had previously warned in early 2026 that requiring universal citizenship documentation checks would impose “significant compliance costs” — costs that ultimately get spread across all banking customers.
Expert Policy Analysis
Policy experts across the political spectrum warned that the administration’s approach:
- Conflates tax compliance (what ITINs are for) with immigration enforcement (what they were never designed for)
- Creates systemic incentives for immigrants to avoid formal banking — the opposite of what anti-money-laundering frameworks require
- Would push economic activity underground, making financial crimes harder to detect
- Imposes disproportionate administrative costs on smaller community banks and credit unions
The May 19, 2026 Executive Order: “Restoring Integrity to America’s Financial System”
EO Number: Executive Order 14406
Date Signed: May 19, 2026
Published in Federal Register: Volume 91, Issue 99 (May 22, 2026)
White House URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/05/restoring-integrity-to-americas-financial-system/
What the EO Directs
The order established a cascade of regulatory requirements with specific deadlines:
Within 60 days (by approximately July 18, 2026):
- Treasury Secretary must issue a formal advisory to financial institutions identifying “red flags and suspicious activity patterns” including:
- Repetitive cash withdrawals
- Use of shell companies to conceal account ownership
- Off-the-books wage payments and structuring schemes
- Labor trafficking indicators
- Use of an ITIN to open accounts or obtain credit without verified legal immigration status
- Use of foreign consular identification cards
Within 90 days (by approximately August 17, 2026):
- Treasury, in consultation with federal financial regulators, must propose changes to BSA regulations to “strengthen risk-based customer due diligence requirements”
- Changes must ensure institutions can “obtain additional information necessary to resolve material compliance concerns, including information relevant to whether account holders possess lawful immigration status”
Within 180 days (by approximately November 15, 2026):
- Treasury and financial regulators must consider changes to customer identification program requirements, including accounting for “the risks that foreign consular identification cards pose to the U.S. financial system”
CFPB directed separately to:
- Consider modifying “ability-to-repay” regulations to clarify that “potential deportation and loss of wages are factors that could affect a borrower’s ability to repay a loan”
Scope of Impact
If fully implemented, the order would affect access to:
- Checking and savings accounts (ITIN holders could face enhanced scrutiny or denial)
- Mortgage loans (banks warned to be “attentive to credit risks” of lending to “inadmissible and removable alien population”)
- Auto loans (same framing as mortgages)
- Credit cards (identified explicitly in EO text)
- Consumer credit generally
The EO text specifically states banks “should also be attentive to the credit risks posed by the extension of mortgage and auto loans, credit cards, and other consumer credit to the inadmissible and removable alien population.”
What the EO Does Not Do
The EO does not:
- Mandate that banks check every customer’s citizenship status
- Require banks to deny accounts to ITIN holders
- Authorize banks to close existing accounts without further regulatory guidance
However, the risk of regulatory enforcement pressure — and the order’s designation of ITIN use as a suspicious activity indicator — creates compliance pressure that experts warn will lead to voluntary account denials and closures, particularly at risk-averse institutions.
NCLC Analysis
The National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) issued a statement on May 20, 2026, the day after signing:
“If implemented by regulators, this ill-conceived executive order will radically destabilize the U.S. financial system and force debanking on an unprecedented scale.” — Diane Thompson, Deputy Director and Chief Advocacy Officer, NCLC
“Removing the ability of immigrants to hold secure bank accounts and send payments to family members in need is misguided and cruel. This Administration has been preoccupied with people being ‘debanked;’ however, this EO is an effort to systematically debank millions of people based on suspicion and stereotypes.” — Carla Sanchez-Adams, Senior Attorney, NCLC
“Entire communities face the prospect of being debanked.” — NCLC
“Financial regulators, bankers, and mortgage lenders should not be conscripted to fight this president’s war on [immigrants].” — Diane Thompson, NCLC
Government Officials Associated
President Donald Trump
- Signed Executive Order 14406 on May 19, 2026
- Administration framed the order as financial system protection while acknowledging it was tied to immigration enforcement objectives
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent
- Stated publicly that “there should be stricter rules to open bank accounts”
- Directed under EO 14406 to issue the advisory identifying red flags within 60 days
- Directed to propose BSA regulatory changes within 90 days
- Directed to develop new customer identification program rules within 180 days
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) / Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
- Ran the Operation Pickpocket investigation into immigrant bank accounts
- Investigation found most accounts were lawfully opened — failing to document the widespread fraud that the policy was built around
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)
- FinCEN, Treasury’s financial intelligence unit, issues Suspicious Activity Report guidance and BSA implementing regulations
- Expected to be central to drafting the advisory and regulatory changes directed by EO 14406
- Role in Operation Pickpocket investigation has not been publicly confirmed
[NEEDS VERIFICATION — 2026-05-30]
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)
- Directed under EO 14406 to consider modifications to ability-to-repay regulations that would treat potential deportation as a credit risk factor
Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould
- Told Congress in a hearing that citizenship check requirements would be “limited,” helping to narrow the order’s final scope and assuage banking industry concerns about compliance costs (American Banker, May 2026)
Broader Context: Attrition Through Pressure
Operation Pickpocket and EO 14406 are components of a multi-front strategy — sometimes called “attrition through pressure” or “self-deportation” — designed to make life in the United States sufficiently difficult that undocumented immigrants (and, critics note, many legal immigrants and mixed-status families) choose to leave voluntarily.
The May 30, 2026 New York Times article documenting Operation Pickpocket’s findings framed it within a broader pattern of simultaneous financial, employment, housing, and healthcare pressure:
Financial exclusion (this tracker):
- Operation Pickpocket investigation
- EO 14406 designating ITIN accounts as suspicious
- Pressure on banks to deny accounts to ITIN holders
Employment:
- Aggressive employer audits for I-9 verification
- E-Verify mandate expansion
- Raids on worksites employing undocumented workers (sweeping up legal workers)
- The Raquel Molina case: 28-year airport worker with valid SSN and work authorization fired during immigration enforcement climate
Housing:
- HUD policy changes affecting immigrants’ housing assistance access
- Landlord-facing pressure through local enforcement partnerships
Healthcare:
- Medicaid and public health program eligibility restrictions affecting immigrants regardless of status
Together, these measures constitute a coordinated campaign to make essential services inaccessible to immigrants — a strategy that civil rights organizations and policy experts argue sweeps up legal immigrants, temporary status holders, and mixed-status families alongside its undocumented targets.
Opposition and Legal Challenges
National Consumer Law Center (NCLC)
The NCLC issued its most comprehensive opposition statement on May 20, 2026, calling the executive order “ill-conceived” and warning of systemic financial destabilization. NCLC’s senior attorney Carla Sanchez-Adams called it “an effort to systematically debank millions of people based on suspicion and stereotypes” — pointedly noting the irony that the same administration had rhetorically opposed “debanking” of cryptocurrency firms and conservatives. (NCLC Press Release, May 20, 2026)
Banking Industry
Trade associations representing banks and credit unions pushed back strongly on earlier proposals to require universal citizenship documentation checks. The American Bankers Association (ABA) helped define the order’s more limited final scope — stopping short of a blanket citizenship-verification mandate — citing the prohibitive compliance costs and legal risks of implementing such a system. However, banks remained uncertain about how aggressively implementing agencies would translate the order’s guidance directives. (American Banker, May 2026)
Court Action: IRS Data Sharing Blocked
Federal courts separately blocked the IRS from sharing ITIN filer data with ICE or DHS for the 2026 filing season, protecting taxpayer privacy. This ruling limited the government’s ability to use tax records to identify and target ITIN holders for immigration enforcement — though EO 14406 pursues the same population through the banking system rather than the tax system.
Civil Rights Organizations
The National Immigration Law Center and the American Immigration Council documented that ITINs were created specifically for tax compliance regardless of immigration status, and that treating ITIN use as suspicious contradicts the IRS’s own stated purpose for the program. Both organizations warned of chilling effects on immigrant communities’ willingness to participate in formal financial systems.
Congressional Response
Congressional oversight of EO 14406 and Operation Pickpocket’s findings is pending as of May 30, 2026. The revelation that Operation Pickpocket failed to document widespread fraud — making it the investigative predicate for a sweeping executive order — is a potential target for oversight inquiry. [NEEDS VERIFICATION — 2026-05-30]
Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| Unknown (pre-May 2026) | Department of Homeland Security / ICE launches Operation Pickpocket investigation into immigrant bank accounts opened with ITINs and consular IDs |
| Pre-May 19, 2026 | Operation Pickpocket investigation concludes; internal findings show most accounts were lawfully opened; no widespread fraud documented |
| March 2026 (approx.) | Earlier, more expansive citizenship-check banking proposal reportedly tabled after banking industry pushback and OCC testimony limiting scope |
| May 19, 2026 | President Trump signs Executive Order 14406, “Restoring Integrity to America’s Financial System” |
| May 19, 2026 | White House releases fact sheet framing EO as financial security measure; cites Chinese money laundering networks and fentanyl cartel activity |
| May 20, 2026 | NCLC issues statement calling EO “ill-conceived” and warning of unprecedented forced debanking |
| May 22, 2026 | EO 14406 published in Federal Register, Vol. 91, Issue 99 |
| May 30, 2026 | New York Times publishes “Trump Squeezes Immigrants by Cutting Them Off From Jobs, Health Care and Housing,” reporting that Operation Pickpocket failed to document widespread fraud |
| ~July 18, 2026 | Deadline: Treasury must issue formal advisory to banks identifying suspicious activity patterns including ITIN use |
| ~August 17, 2026 | Deadline: Treasury must propose BSA regulatory changes for customer due diligence |
| ~November 15, 2026 | Deadline: Treasury and regulators must consider new customer identification requirements re: consular IDs |
Investigative Trails
FOIA Requests to Pursue
Department of Homeland Security / ICE:
- Operation Pickpocket investigation records: start date, scope, methodology, and full findings
- Internal communications regarding the use of Operation Pickpocket findings to support EO 14406
- Number of accounts reviewed; breakdown of findings by account type, institution, and outcome
- Any records showing the gap between investigation findings and the EO’s policy rationale
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN):
- Any FinCEN involvement in Operation Pickpocket
- Internal communications on ITIN-based account analysis and suspicious activity typologies
- Draft advisory to financial institutions identifying red flags under EO 14406
Department of the Treasury:
- Communications between Treasury and DHS/ICE regarding Operation Pickpocket
- Scott Bessent’s internal briefings on the investigation’s findings
- Draft BSA regulatory changes being developed under the 90-day EO deadline
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau:
- Analysis of impact on immigrant consumers
- Rulemaking records for ability-to-repay standard modifications
Primary Sources
- EO 14406 full text: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/05/restoring-integrity-to-americas-financial-system/
- White House fact sheet: https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2026/05/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-restores-integrity-to-americas-financial-system/
- Federal Register publication: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-05-22/html/2026-10400.htm
- NCLC analysis: https://www.nclc.org/executive-order-will-cut-off-financial-services-to-millions-of-immigrants/
Congressional Oversight Opportunities
- Senate Banking Committee oversight of EO 14406 implementation
- House Financial Services Committee investigation of the gap between Operation Pickpocket findings and EO 14406 policy rationale
- Congressional Budget Office scoring of compliance cost estimates
- Requests for Government Accountability Office review of FinCEN advisory process
Monitoring Watchpoints
- FinCEN advisory: Watch for publication within 60 days of May 19, 2026 (~July 18, 2026) — this will define how aggressively ITIN accounts will be treated
- BSA regulatory proposal: Watch Treasury’s Federal Register notices for proposed BSA changes within 90 days
- CFPB rulemaking: Watch for ability-to-repay modification proposals affecting immigrant borrowers
- Bank account closure reports: Monitor community banking organizations and immigrant advocacy groups for data on ITIN-account closures following advisory
Factcheck Notice
Factual correction requests: If you believe information in this profile is incorrect, please contact factcheck@patriot.university with your name (optional), the specific claim, and any supporting documentation. We review all submissions and correct verified errors promptly.
Sources
- Nicholas Nehamas, Miriam Jordan, Coral Davenport, Hamed Aleaziz, Lydia DePillis, and Zolan Kanno-Youngs. “Trump Squeezes Immigrants by Cutting Them Off From Jobs, Health Care and Housing.” The New York Times, May 30, 2026. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/30/us/politics/trump-immigrants-health-housing.html (Primary source for Operation Pickpocket investigation and findings)
- White House. “Restoring Integrity to America’s Financial System — Executive Order 14406.” Presidential Actions, May 19, 2026. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/05/restoring-integrity-to-americas-financial-system/
- White House. “Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Restores Integrity to America’s Financial System.” May 19, 2026. https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2026/05/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-restores-integrity-to-americas-financial-system/
- Federal Register, Volume 91, Issue 99 (May 22, 2026). Executive Order 14406. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-05-22/html/2026-10400.htm
- The American Presidency Project. “Executive Order 14406 — Restoring Integrity to America’s Financial System.” University of California Santa Barbara. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-14406-restoring-integrity-americas-financial-system
- National Consumer Law Center (NCLC). “Executive Order Will Cut Off Financial Services to Millions of Immigrants.” Press Release, May 20, 2026. https://www.nclc.org/executive-order-will-cut-off-financial-services-to-millions-of-immigrants/ (Source for Diane Thompson and Carla Sanchez-Adams quotes)
- American Banker. “White House Issues Immigration Executive Order for Banks.” May 2026. https://www.americanbanker.com/news/white-house-issues-immigration-executive-order-for-banks
- Ogletree Deakins. “New Executive Order Calls for Stricter Vetting by Financial Institutions.” May 2026. https://ogletree.com/insights-resources/blog-posts/new-executive-order-calls-for-stricter-vetting-by-financial-institutions/
- Steven Boardman. “The Bank Account as Border Checkpoint.” Substack, May 2026. https://stevenboardman.substack.com/p/the-bank-account-as-border-checkpoint (Analysis; cites Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, National Immigration Law Center, American Immigration Council)
- We Are Mitú. “Trump’s New Executive Order Could Cut Off Millions of Immigrants From Banking: Here’s What You Need to Know.” May 2026. https://wearemitu.com/wearemitu/news/trump-banking-order-undocumented-immigrants/
- NBSLA. “Trump Banking Immigration Status Order Sparks Fear Across America.” May 2026. https://nbsla.ca/trump-banking-immigration-status-order/
- IRS. “Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN).” IRS.gov. (Background on ITIN purpose and eligibility)
- Internal Revenue Code § 6109; 26 C.F.R. § 301.6109-1. (Statutory basis for ITIN program)
- Bank Secrecy Act Customer Identification Program regulations, 31 C.F.R. § 1020.220. (Existing KYC standards against which EO 14406 is measured)
- Right to Financial Privacy Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 3401–3422. (Federal statute protecting customer financial records from government access)
