Cantor Fitzgerald — Accountability Profile
Accountability Profiles

Cantor Fitzgerald — Accountability Profile

Skip to main content
< All Topics
Print

Cantor Fitzgerald — Accountability Profile

Basis for Inclusion: Cantor Fitzgerald is a financial-services organization whose ownership passed from Howard Lutnick — upon his confirmation as U.S. Commerce Secretary — to trusts benefiting his sons, who now run the firm. While Lutnick directed federal mineral, trade, and financing policy as Commerce Secretary, Cantor earned fees raising capital for companies that simultaneously sought or received federal support, including parties to the Kazakhstan tungsten deal. This profile documents the factual relationship between a cabinet official’s former firm and federal actions affecting that firm’s clients. Subject classification: Organization. Inclusion is based on documented financial transactions creating conflicts of interest connected to a public official (Anchor C — financial enablement). This profile does not allege illegality.

Overview

Cantor Fitzgerald is a New York–based global financial-services firm active in investment banking, capital markets, prime brokerage, and — increasingly — digital assets and critical-minerals financing. For decades it was led by Howard Lutnick, who built the firm after it lost two-thirds of its workforce in the September 11, 2001 attacks. [CREDIBLY REPORTED]

In February 2025, Lutnick was confirmed as the 41st United States Secretary of Commerce and stepped down from his positions at Cantor Fitzgerald. [DOCUMENTED — Cantor Fitzgerald press release, February 2025] In May 2025, he divested his longstanding ownership, transferring control into trusts benefiting his adult children and bringing in an investor group that included Apollo co-founder Josh Harris’s firm 26North and Oak Hill Advisors founder Glenn August as minority owners. [DOCUMENTED — Bloomberg, May 19, 2025] His sons Brandon Lutnick (chairman) and Kyle Lutnick (executive vice chairman) were appointed to lead the firm earlier that year following their father’s confirmation. [DOCUMENTED — Cantor Fitzgerald, “Cantor Fitzgerald announces next generation of ownership,” 2025]

The divestiture satisfied federal ethics requirements. [CREDIBLY REPORTED — Bloomberg, Epoch Times] The firm Lutnick once controlled, however, remained an active participant in deals touching the agency he came to lead.

Role in the Kazakhstan Tungsten Deal

According to The New York Times, Cantor Fitzgerald — described as “an investment company controlled by Mr. Lutnick’s family and overseen by his sons Brandon and Kyle Lutnick” — helped one of the lead investors working with Dominari Securities on the Kazakh deal raise $210 million in new capital for a related entity. [CREDIBLY REPORTED — NYT, June 28, 2026]

The capital raise was for ASP Isotopes, the nuclear-energy company of British investor Paul E. Mann, in October 2025 — at the same time an ASP subsidiary was preparing to invest in the Kazakhstan tungsten venture that Lutnick was simultaneously negotiating as Commerce Secretary. [CREDIBLY REPORTED — NYT] Such capital-raise rounds “typically net Cantor millions of dollars in fees.” [CREDIBLY REPORTED — NYT]

Mann stated in an interview that the money Cantor raised for ASP Isotopes “was not used in the mining deal,” and that he did not select Cantor because of Lutnick’s government role, asking, “Should Cantor exclude themselves from all deals in the mining sector? That’s unfair on Cantor.” [CREDIBLY REPORTED — NYT]

Broader Pattern Across Federally Backed Mineral Deals

The Times reported that Cantor Fitzgerald has financial ties to multiple companies that have benefited from, or have pending applications for, federal support in the critical-minerals sector:

  • USA Rare Earth: Cantor “separately earned millions of dollars in fees by helping USA Rare Earth in a series of deals since last year that ultimately raised $1.5 billion.” [CREDIBLY REPORTED — NYT] The Commerce Department this year committed up to $1.6 billion in support to USA Rare Earth and received 16 million shares of company stock. [CREDIBLY REPORTED — NYT]
  • Perpetua Resources: Cantor served as underwriter on financing for Perpetua, which was approved for a $2.9 billion loan from the Export-Import Bank for a central Idaho gold and antimony project. [CREDIBLY REPORTED — NYT]

In a December 17, 2025 letter, Democratic senators including Elizabeth Warren pressed Lutnick on the USA Rare Earth arrangement, writing that it was “the latest example of how official Commerce Department business has intersected with Cantor Fitzgerald’s financial interests during your tenure.” [DOCUMENTED — Senate letter to the Commerce Inspector General, December 17, 2025; CREDIBLY REPORTED — CNBC, February 26, 2026]

Company Response

A Cantor spokesman, Stan Neve, told The Times that the company’s executives “were not involved in discussions related to government funding on behalf of their mining industry clients,” and that “Cantor is a natural partner for companies raising capital to meet the growing demand for critical minerals.” [CREDIBLY REPORTED — NYT] The Commerce Department stated that neither Lutnick nor anyone at the department “had interacted with or had any discussions whatsoever with Cantor Fitzgerald regarding the rare earth minerals industry,” and noted that Lutnick had sold his ownership stake in Cantor. [CREDIBLY REPORTED — NYT]

Subsequent Developments and Congressional Oversight

The June 2026 NYT investigation followed — and intensified — months of congressional scrutiny of the Trump administration’s taxpayer-funded mineral-equity program, several threads of which touch Cantor’s clients:

  • February 2026: Ranking Members Sen. Martin Heinrich (Senate Energy & Natural Resources), Rep. Jared Huffman (House Natural Resources), and Rep. Robert Garcia (House Oversight) demanded documents and a briefing from the Secretaries of Defense, Energy, Commerce, and the Interior regarding federal equity stakes acquired in mining and mineral companies since July 2025 — a list that includes USA Rare Earth and Vulcan Elements, both connected to Cantor or the Trump family. The lawmakers asked specifically whether “Administration officials, their families, Trump campaign donors, or Trump Organization affiliates hold personal stakes in any of these companies,” and sent parallel letters to seven mining and mineral-processing companies. [DOCUMENTED — Senate Energy & Natural Resources and House Natural Resources Committee press releases, February 2026]
  • January 21, 2026: The House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources held an oversight hearing on the federal mineral-financing program. [DOCUMENTED — House Natural Resources Committee]

These actions build on the December 2025 Warren inquiry noted above, which tied “official Commerce Department business” directly to “Cantor Fitzgerald’s financial interests.”

Conflict of Interest Analysis

The sequence raises factual questions about the relationship between a cabinet official’s family business and the policy portfolio he oversees:

  1. February 2025: Howard Lutnick confirmed as Commerce Secretary; steps down from Cantor; sons Brandon and Kyle appointed to lead the firm.
  2. May 2025: Lutnick transfers Cantor ownership into trusts for his children; 26North and Oak Hill join as minority owners.
  3. October 2025: Cantor raises $210 million for ASP Isotopes, a firm whose subsidiary was preparing to invest in the Kazakhstan deal Lutnick was negotiating as Commerce Secretary.
  4. 2025–2026: Cantor earns fees on USA Rare Earth’s $1.5 billion in raises and underwrites Perpetua Resources financing — both recipients of federal support.
  5. December 2025: Senators open a conflict-of-interest inquiry tying Commerce Department business to Cantor’s financial interests.

Lutnick divested his personal stake and the department denies any contact with Cantor on minerals matters. The factual record nonetheless shows a firm now run by the Commerce Secretary’s children repeatedly earning fees from companies seeking or receiving the federal financing his department helps direct.

For Trump Supporters: Questions Worth Considering

  1. Does divesting to your own children remove a conflict of interest? Lutnick transferred Cantor to trusts benefiting Brandon and Kyle. Is a family firm run by your sons meaningfully separate from your family’s financial interests?
  2. Why does the Commerce Secretary’s family firm keep appearing in deals his department finances? If the overlap is coincidental, why does it recur across the Kazakhstan deal, USA Rare Earth, and Perpetua?
  3. Who decides whether a fee is “earned” or “conflicted”? Cantor says its executives stayed out of government-funding discussions. What independent check confirms that?
  4. Would this be acceptable from the other party? If a Democratic commerce secretary’s children ran a firm earning fees from companies their parent’s department was financing, would the standard be the same?

Investigative Trails

  • Trace Cantor Fitzgerald’s role (placement agent, underwriter, advisor) across each of the federally backed critical-minerals deals identified by The Times.
  • FOIA Commerce Department communications regarding ASP Isotopes, USA Rare Earth, Perpetua Resources, and Kaz Resources.
  • Review the Commerce Inspector General’s response to the December 2025 Senate inquiry.
  • Examine SEC filings for fee disclosures on the ASP Isotopes and USA Rare Earth capital raises.
  • Track the terms of Lutnick’s divestiture trusts and whether they insulate him from upside in Cantor’s minerals-sector business.

Education only — verify independently. Absence of hits is not proof.

> Factual correction requests: If you believe information in this profile is incorrect, please contact factcheck@patriot.university with your name (optional), the specific claim, and any supporting documentation. We review all submissions and correct verified errors promptly.

## Sources

1. The New York Times, Paul Sonne and Eric Lipton, “Trump Cut a Billion-Dollar Mining Deal. His Sons Stand to Profit,” June 28, 2026.

2. Cantor Fitzgerald, “Howard Lutnick Confirmed as 41st United States Secretary of Commerce; Steps down from his positions at Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P.,” February 2025. https://www.cantor.com/howard-lutnick-confirmed-as-41st-united-states-secretary-of-commerce-steps-down-from-his-positions-at-cantor-fitzgerald-l-p/

3. Cantor Fitzgerald, “Cantor Fitzgerald announces next generation of ownership,” 2025. https://www.cantor.com/cantor-fitzgerald-announces-next-generation-of-ownership/

4. Bloomberg, “Commerce Secretary Lutnick Divests Cantor Fitzgerald to Children, 26North,” May 19, 2025. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-05-19/lutnick-divests-cantor-fitzgerald-to-children-investor-26north

5. The Epoch Times, “US Commerce Secretary Divests From Cantor Fitzgerald,” 2025. https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/us-commerce-secretary-divests-from-cantor-fitzgerald-5859992

6. CNBC, “Democratic senators press Commerce Secretary Lutnick on conflict of interest concerns in USA Rare Earth deal,” February 26, 2026. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/26/warren-lutnick-usa-rare-earth-usar-critical-minerals.html

7. U.S. Senate (Warren et al.), Letter to the Commerce Department Acting Inspector General, December 17, 2025. https://www.warren.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/warren_dean_letter_to_commerce_ig.pdf

8. The Financial Times, reporting on the Special Purpose Vehicle’s stake in Skyline Builders, 2026 [publication date not available].

9. U.S. Senate Energy & Natural Resources Committee (Heinrich) / House Natural Resources Committee (Huffman) / House Oversight (Garcia), “Ranking Members Demand Transparency from Trump Administration on Taxpayer-Funded Mining Spending Spree,” February 2026. https://www.energy.senate.gov/2026/2/ranking-members-heinrich-huffman-garcia-demand-transparency-from-trump-administration-on-taxpayer-funded-mining-spending-spree

10. House Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Oversight Hearing, January 21, 2026.

This profile documents publicly available information about business dealings and government actions. It does not allege illegality. If any claim requires correction, contact patriot.university with documentation.

Was this article helpful?
0 out of 5 stars
5 Stars 0%
4 Stars 0%
3 Stars 0%
2 Stars 0%
1 Stars 0%
5
Please Share Your Feedback
How Can We Improve This Article?
Table of Contents