Ken Paxton — Texas Attorney General, Impeached, 2026 U.S. Senate Nominee
State Legislators

Ken Paxton — Texas Attorney General, Impeached, 2026 U.S. Senate Nominee

Skip to main content
< All Topics
Print

Ken Paxton — Texas Attorney General, Impeached, 2026 U.S. Senate Nominee

Category: State Official — Attorney General Role: Texas Attorney General (2015–present); 2026 Republican nominee for U.S. Senate (Texas); former Texas State Senator (2012–2014); former Texas State Representative (2002–2012) Profile Type: Accountability Profile — Public Official (elected statewide officer) Priority: P1 — Filed Texas v. Pennsylvania to overturn 2020 election results in four states; impeached by the Texas House on bribery and abuse-of-office charges; lost a $6.6 million whistleblower-retaliation judgment; ended a nine-year state securities-fraud prosecution via pretrial diversion after the SEC’s parallel federal case was dismissed with prejudice


Basis for Inclusion

Subject classification: Public Official (elected statewide officer — Texas Attorney General; 2026 major-party U.S. Senate nominee)

Anchor criterion met: As a sitting Attorney General, Paxton used the authority of his office to file Texas v. Pennsylvania — a lawsuit seeking to invalidate the certified election results of four sovereign states — and was formally impeached by his own state legislature on charges of bribery and abuse of office.

A Texas court has entered a $6.6 million judgment against his office for firing the aides who reported him to the FBI. He was indicted on felony securities-fraud charges that were resolved in 2024 by pretrial diversion (charges dismissed after restitution, community service, and ethics training). These are documented official actions and adjudicated legal proceedings, not political speech.

What is NOT the basis for inclusion: Paxton’s Republican affiliation, his conservative legal philosophy, his endorsement of political candidates, or his political opinions are not the basis for this profile.


Background

Warren Kenneth Paxton Jr. (born December 1, 1963) earned his JD from the University of Virginia School of Law in 1990. He served in the Texas House of Representatives (2002–2012) and the Texas State Senate (2012–2014) before being elected Attorney General in 2014. On May 26, 2026, he defeated incumbent U.S. Sen. John Cornyn in the Republican runoff for U.S. Senate and became the Republican nominee for that seat in the November 2026 general election.


Documented Actions

1. Texas v. Pennsylvania — Attempt to Overturn 2020 Election (December 2020)

On December 7, 2020, Paxton filed an original action in the U.S. Supreme Court (Texas v. Pennsylvania, No. 22O155) seeking to invalidate the certified election results in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin — all states that President-elect Biden won.

The lawsuit alleged that these states made unconstitutional changes to their election procedures. Constitutional law scholars across the ideological spectrum described the suit as legally unprecedented and lacking merit:

  • It asked one state to invalidate another state’s election results — a theory with no constitutional basis
  • 18 Republican state attorneys general joined as amici
  • 126 Republican House members signed an amicus brief supporting the suit

On December 11, 2020, the Supreme Court denied the motion for leave to file a bill of complaint “for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution,” holding that “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections.” All other pending motions were dismissed as moot.

Source: Texas v. Pennsylvania, No. 22O155, U.S. Supreme Court, order dated December 11, 2020. Docket: SCOTUSblog case page.

2. Securities Fraud Case — Indicted 2015, Resolved by Pretrial Diversion (March 2024)

In July 2015, a Collin County grand jury indicted Paxton on two first-degree felony charges of securities fraud and one third-degree felony charge of failing to register with state securities regulators. The charges related to his promotion of Servergy Inc. stock to investors without disclosing that the company was compensating him for the referrals. Venue was later transferred to Harris County.

  • Parallel SEC civil case dismissed with prejudice (March 2017). U.S. District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III of the Eastern District of Texas dismissed the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s civil lawsuit against Paxton for the second and final time, concluding Paxton “had no plausible legal duty” to tell Servergy investors he was being paid to promote the company (Courthouse News Service, March 2017).
  • State criminal case ended by pretrial diversion (March 26, 2024). Weeks before trial, special prosecutors and Paxton’s counsel announced an agreement in a Houston courtroom under which Paxton would pay nearly $300,000 in restitution, complete 100 hours of community service, and take ethics-training courses — after which the two first-degree felony counts and the third-degree felony count would be dismissed. Paxton did not plead guilty to any offense (Associated Press via KCRA, March 26, 2024; Indiana Lawyer / AP recap).

Court record: State of Texas v. Warren Kenneth Paxton Jr., Collin County (indictment filed July 2015); case transferred to Harris County, 177th Judicial District, in 2017; charges dismissed under pretrial diversion agreement, March 26, 2024.

3. Texas House Impeachment — Bribery and Abuse of Office (May 2023)

On May 27, 2023, the Texas House of Representatives voted 121–23 to impeach Paxton on 20 articles of impeachment adopted as House Resolution 2377 (88th Legislature, Regular Session). The articles included, among other charges:

  • Bribery and a corrupt relationship with political donor Nate Paul (Austin real estate developer)
  • Abuse of official capacity
  • Obstruction of justice, including obstruction of the securities-fraud prosecution against him
  • Making false statements to the Texas State Securities Board
  • Misuse of office to benefit Nate Paul, including ordering agency investigations and legal interventions on Paul’s behalf

The vote was bipartisan — in a Republican-supermajority chamber, 60 Republicans joined all Democrats in voting to impeach.

Source: Texas House Resolution 2377, official bill text at Texas Legislature Online (H.R. No. 2377, 88(R), Introduced version), certified adopted May 27, 2023, Yeas 121, Nays 23; Texas Senate Court of Impeachment page.

4. Texas Senate Acquittal (September 2023)

The Texas Senate tried Paxton on 16 articles in September 2023 and acquitted him on all counts (dismissing the remaining four articles). Key context:

  • Paxton’s wife, Angela Paxton, served as a Texas State Senator and was present (but barred from voting) during the trial
  • Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, who presided over the trial, had received $3 million in campaign contributions from a pro-Paxton PAC (Defend Texas Liberty) during the proceedings
  • The Texas Senate trial itself cost the state approximately $5.1 million, per a March 2025 State Auditor’s Office report requested by Lt. Gov. Patrick

Source: Texas Senate Court of Impeachment record, September 5–16, 2023 (senate.texas.gov/coi.php); Texas State Auditor’s Office report cited in Texas Tribune, April 4, 2025.

5. FBI Investigation and Whistleblower Retaliation — $6.6 Million Judgment (2020–2025)

In September–October 2020, eight senior officials in Paxton’s office — including his first assistant attorney general — reported Paxton to the FBI, alleging he was using his office to benefit Nate Paul in exchange for Paul employing a woman with whom Paxton was having an affair, and for Paul renovating Paxton’s home.

Paxton fired or forced out the whistleblowers. Four of them sued under the Texas Whistleblower Act. The subsequent litigation ran from 2020 through 2025:

  • February 2023 — Tentative $3.3 million settlement. Paxton’s office agreed to pay $3.3 million and issue an apology. The settlement required legislative appropriation, which the Texas House declined to fund; that refusal triggered the House investigation that led to the May 2023 impeachment.
  • November 2024 — Texas Supreme Court. The Texas Supreme Court ruled that Paxton and three of his top deputies did not have to sit for depositions because Paxton’s agreement not to contest the lawsuit made sworn testimony unnecessary.
  • April 4, 2025 — Travis County judgment. After Paxton conceded liability in state court, a Travis County district judge entered judgment for the four whistleblowers totaling approximately $6.6 million (damages plus attorneys’ fees). Paxton initially vowed to appeal, then dropped the appeal — leaving the judgment intact and the appropriation to the Texas Legislature (Texas Tribune, April 4, 2025).

Source: AP, “Eight senior Texas AG staffers report Paxton to FBI,” October 2020; Texas Tribune, “Attorney General Ken Paxton’s former aides win $6.6 million in whistleblower case,” April 4, 2025, https://www.texastribune.org/2025/04/04/ken-paxton-whistleblower-case-judgment/.

6. Spousal Divorce Filing on Adultery Grounds (July 2025)

On July 10, 2025, Texas State Sen. Angela Paxton filed for divorce from Ken Paxton after 38 years of marriage, citing “biblical grounds” and adultery in the court filing. Court filings stated the couple had lived separately for more than a year. A scheduled divorce trial was canceled in June 2026, with counsel citing “substantial progress toward an amicable resolution.” The filing is documented here because a central factual predicate of the 2023 impeachment articles — Nate Paul’s employment of a woman with whom Paxton was alleged to be having an affair — is directly related to the conduct the divorce petition now cites.

Source: Houston Public Media, “State Sen. Angela Paxton files for divorce from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton,” July 10, 2025; Houston Public Media, “Divorce trial for Ken and Angela Paxton canceled weeks before scheduled start date,” June 2, 2026.

7. 2026 Republican U.S. Senate Primary and Runoff Victory over Sen. Cornyn (May 2026)

Paxton challenged three-term incumbent U.S. Sen. John Cornyn in the 2026 Republican U.S. Senate primary in Texas. The runoff campaign was characterized by Cornyn’s attacks on Paxton’s ethics and record — including the impeachment, alleged infidelity, and the whistleblower judgment — and by Paxton’s framing of Cornyn as insufficiently loyal to former President Trump. Paxton defeated Cornyn in the May 26, 2026 runoff and became the Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate seat, to face Democrat James Talarico in the November 2026 general election.

Source: Wikipedia, “2026 United States Senate election in Texas” (with cited primary reporting from The Texas Tribune, The Dallas Morning News, Houston Public Media).


Pattern Summary

Paxton’s documented conduct represents a pattern of using the power of the attorney general’s office for personal benefit (Nate Paul relationship), retaliating against internal dissent (whistleblower firings — an adjudicated finding of liability), and deploying the state’s legal authority to advance partisan electoral goals (Texas v. Pennsylvania). The nine-year state securities-fraud prosecution ended in 2024 without a trial and without a guilty plea, under a pretrial diversion agreement that dismissed the charges after restitution and community service; the SEC’s parallel federal civil case had been dismissed with prejudice in 2017. As of 2026, Paxton is the sitting Attorney General of Texas and the Republican nominee for U.S. Senate.


Investigative Trails

Education only — verify independently. Absence of hits is not proof.

  • Supreme Court docket: Texas v. Pennsylvania, No. 22O155
  • Collin County / Harris County court records: Securities fraud indictment and case history
  • Texas House and Senate records: Impeachment articles, trial transcripts, vote records
  • FBI investigation records: Referenced in whistleblower complaints and subsequent reporting
  • Texas Ethics Commission: Campaign finance filings
  • FEC filings: Federal campaign contributions and PAC activity

Factual correction requests: If you believe information in this profile is incorrect, please contact factcheck@patriot.university with your name (optional), the specific claim, and any supporting documentation. We review all submissions and correct verified errors promptly.


Sources

  1. Texas v. Pennsylvania, No. 22O155, U.S. Supreme Court, order dated December 11, 2020 (motion for leave to file bill of complaint denied for lack of Article III standing). Docket: SCOTUSblog case page.
  2. Texas House Resolution 2377, 88th Legislature, Regular Session — Articles of Impeachment against Warren Kenneth Paxton Jr., adopted May 27, 2023, Yeas 121 / Nays 23. Texas Legislature Online.
  3. Texas Senate Court of Impeachment, Warren Kenneth Paxton Jr., September 2023 — senate.texas.gov/coi.php.
  4. State of Texas v. Warren Kenneth Paxton Jr., Collin County (indictment filed July 2015); venue transferred to Harris County, 177th Judicial District, 2017; charges dismissed under pretrial diversion agreement, March 26, 2024. Reported by Associated Press via KCRA and Indiana Lawyer / AP.
  5. SEC v. Paxton, E.D. Tex., dismissed with prejudice March 2017 — Courthouse News Service.
  6. Texas Tribune, “Attorney General Ken Paxton’s former aides win $6.6 million in whistleblower case,” April 4, 2025 — https://www.texastribune.org/2025/04/04/ken-paxton-whistleblower-case-judgment/.
  7. Houston Public Media, “State Sen. Angela Paxton files for divorce from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton,” July 10, 2025 — https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/articles/news/politics/2025/07/10/526139/state-sen-angela-paxton-files-for-divorce-from-texas-attorney-general-ken-paxton/.
  8. Houston Public Media, “Divorce trial for Ken and Angela Paxton canceled weeks before scheduled start date,” June 2, 2026 — https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/articles/news/texas/2026/06/02/553462/texas-paxton-divorce-trial-canceled/.
  9. Wikipedia, “2026 United States Senate election in Texas” — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_United_States_Senate_election_in_Texas (secondary compilation; primary sources include The Texas Tribune, The Dallas Morning News, Houston Public Media).
Was this article helpful?
0 out of 5 stars
5 Stars 0%
4 Stars 0%
3 Stars 0%
2 Stars 0%
1 Stars 0%
5
Please Share Your Feedback
How Can We Improve This Article?
Table of Contents