Retribution Accountability Tracker — Query Skill
AI Skills

Retribution Accountability Tracker — Query Skill

Skip to main content
< All Topics
Print

Retribution Accountability Tracker — Query Skill

Posted
Updated
ByPU Publish
0 out of 5 stars
5 Stars 0%
4 Stars 0%
3 Stars 0%
2 Stars 0%
1 Stars 0%

What Data Is Available

The Retribution Accountability Tracker is a validated JSON ledger — patriot-agent-base/tracker/data/retribution_events.json (schema: retribution_events.schema.json) — governed by docs/retribution-methodology.md. One record per retributive act. A rendered, reader-facing view lives at the KB doc truth-reconciliation/retribution-accountability-tracker.md, and a Flask dashboard at /retribution.

Each event carries:

  • target — {name, type, profile_slug?} (individual / company / university / law_firm / media / federal_employee / organization / official)
  • act_type — one of: firing_removal, prosecution, subpoena, investigation, clearance_revocation, contract_cancellation, funding_freeze, license_bar_targeting, immigration_weaponization, access_revocation, regulatory_pressure, executive_order
  • responsible[] — the responsibility chain: each party has a role (orderer / approver / signatory / notifier / executor / spokesperson), an evidence_tier, a confidence, and a responsibility flag (documented → may be named; inferred → role only, never named)
  • rss — Retribution Severity Score 1–5
  • harm{} — career / economic_security / reputation / family / chilling_effect (none/low/moderate/severe)
  • cruelty_evidence[] — sourced on-the-record quotes evidencing punitive intent
  • trc_classification — A (prosecution track) / B (institutional-reform track) / C (truth-telling / record)
  • status, confidence, sources[], dms_ref (link to a profile’s Democratic Malice Assessment)

The Naming Rule (read before answering)

A responsible party is reported as a named individual ONLY when responsibility: documented. Where responsibility is inferred, report the role and agency only (“a DOJ signatory,” “the OMB director’s office”) — never assert a named person as the actor. When an answer surfaces inferred attribution, say so explicitly (“this attribution is inferred, not documented”). This mirrors the defamation posture in docs/retribution-methodology.md §3 and .cursor/rules/patriot-retribution-tracker.mdc.

How to Query

By target

Find every act against a target by searching events[].target.name. Example: “What was done to Harvard?” → the funding_freeze event(s) with target.name: Harvard University, their RSS, harm, and (documented) responsible officials.

By official (the accountability question)

The core use. To answer “who is responsible for the most / most severe retribution,” read the responsibility leaderboard — aggregates.responsibility_leaderboard, ranked by severity-weighted score (Σ RSS across documented attributions) then act count. Only documented, named parties appear there. For one official: RetributionTracker.acts_for_official(slug_or_name).

By act type

Group by act_type (aggregates.by_act_type). Example: “Which law firms were hit with executive orders?” → act_type: executive_order with target.type: law_firm.

By severity / TRC track

Filter rss >= 4 for the gravest acts, or trc_classification: A for acts with plausible criminal exposure on the prosecution track.

Cross-Reference with Accountability Profiles

When a documented responsible party carries a profile_slug (or dms_ref), cross-link to their accountability profile’s Retribution Actions section and Democratic Malice Assessment. Officials without a profile are enumerated in docs/retribution-profile-backlog.md (the profile-gap list), ranked to sequence profile creation.

Updating the Data

The ledger is populated by scripts/ingest_retribution_events.py (LLM extraction from the narrative corpus + attribution research) and rendered to the KB doc by scripts/render_retribution_tracker.py. The graph layer is built by scripts/build_retribution_graph.py → docs/retribution-graph.json. Publishing stays human-gated — never run make publish autonomously.

Composing Skills

This skill composes with:

  • retribution-assessment-framework — score a new act (gate + RSS + harm + TRC)
  • retribution-responsibility-tracer — attribute an act to officials to the required evidence tier
  • malice-evaluator — Democratic Malice Assessment for a named perpetrator’s profile
  • public-corruption-ombudsman — officials who weaponize office
  • legal-research-specialist — court-filing verification of prosecutions/subpoenas
Was this article helpful?
0 out of 5 stars
5 Stars 0%
4 Stars 0%
3 Stars 0%
2 Stars 0%
1 Stars 0%
5
Please Share Your Feedback
How Can We Improve This Article?
Table of Contents

Related Articles